The Stacks project

Lemma 13.18.4. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $K^\bullet $ be an acyclic complex. Let $I^\bullet $ be bounded below and consisting of injective objects. Any morphism $K^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ is homotopic to zero.

Proof. Let $\alpha : K^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ be a morphism of complexes. Note that $\alpha ^ j = 0$ for $j \ll 0$ as $I^\bullet $ is bounded below. In particular, we can find an $n$ such that there exist $h^ j : K^ j \to I^{j - 1}$ for $j \leq n$ such that $\alpha ^ j = d^{j - 1} \circ h^ j + h^{j + 1} \circ d^ j$ for $j < n$. We will show that there exists a morphism $h^{n + 1} : K^{n + 1} \to I^ n$ such that $\alpha ^ n = d^{n - 1} \circ h^ n + h^{n + 1} \circ d^ n$. Note that

\begin{align*} (\alpha ^ n - d^{n - 1} \circ h^{n - 1}) \circ d^{n - 1} & = \alpha ^{n - 1} \circ d^{n - 1} - d^{n - 1} \circ h^{n - 1} \circ d^{n - 1} \\ & = d^{n - 1} \circ \alpha ^{n - 1} - d^{n - 1} \circ h^{n - 1} \circ d^{n - 1} \\ & = d^{n - 1} \circ (d^{n - 2} \circ h^{n - 1} + h^ n \circ d^{n - 1}) - d^{n - 1} \circ h^{n - 1} \circ d^{n - 1} \\ & = 0 \end{align*}

Since $K^\bullet $ is acyclic we have $d^{n - 1}(K^{n - 1}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(K^ n \to K^{n + 1})$. Hence we can think of $\alpha ^ n - d^{n - 1} \circ h^{n - 1}$ as a map into $I^ n$ defined on the subobject $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(K^ n \to K^{n + 1})$ of $K^{n + 1}$. By injectivity of the object $I^ n$ we can extend this to a map $h^{n + 1} : K^{n + 1} \to I^ n$. With this choice the reader checks that we indeed have $\alpha ^ n = d^{n - 1} \circ h^ n + h^{n + 1} \circ d^ n$.

By induction on $n$ we conclude we can find $h = (h^ j)_{j \in \mathbf{Z}}$ which forms a homotopy between $\alpha $ and $0$ as desired. $\square$


Comments (3)

Comment #8414 by on

I think what the proof does might not be enough to conclude that is homotopic to zero, https://mathoverflow.net/questions/185366/is-such-a-map-null-homotopic

Comment #8415 by on

The correct proof is not much different from the actual one: suppose there is and that, for each , there are maps such that for all . We are going to construct a map such that . For this, note that Hence, , and we can reuse the already existing argument.

Comment #9039 by on

@#8414: I think this mathoverflow post discusses a different thing because here the proof as it is written now shows there exists a homotopy to go from a map zero in degrees to a map zero in degrees where moreover the homotopy is zero except for the map and that clearly does work (in general). Anyway, I have changed it as you suggested here so the point I just made is now moot (or will be when the site is updated). Thanks.

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 13.18: Injective resolutions

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 013R. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.