Remark 13.18.5. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Using the fact that $K(\mathcal{A})$ is a triangulated category we may use Lemma 13.18.4 to obtain proofs of some of the lemmas below which are usually proved by chasing through diagrams. Namely, suppose that $\alpha : K^\bullet \to L^\bullet$ is a quasi-isomorphism of complexes. Then

$(K^\bullet , L^\bullet , C(\alpha )^\bullet , \alpha , i, -p)$

is a distinguished triangle in $K(\mathcal{A})$ (Lemma 13.9.14) and $C(\alpha )^\bullet$ is an acyclic complex (Lemma 13.11.2). Next, let $I^\bullet$ be a bounded below complex of injective objects. Then

$\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(C(\alpha )^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(L^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(K^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \ar[lld] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(C(\alpha )^\bullet [-1], I^\bullet ) }$

is an exact sequence of abelian groups, see Lemma 13.4.2. At this point Lemma 13.18.4 guarantees that the outer two groups are zero and hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(L^\bullet , I^\bullet ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(K^\bullet , I^\bullet )$.

There are also:

• 2 comment(s) on Section 13.18: Injective resolutions

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05TF. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.