Lemma 13.4.3. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a pre-triangulated category. Let

be a morphism of distinguished triangles. If two among $a, b, c$ are isomorphisms so is the third.

Lemma 13.4.3. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a pre-triangulated category. Let

\[ (a, b, c) : (X, Y, Z, f, g, h) \to (X', Y', Z', f', g', h') \]

be a morphism of distinguished triangles. If two among $a, b, c$ are isomorphisms so is the third.

**Proof.**
Assume that $a$ and $c$ are isomorphisms. For any object $W$ of $\mathcal{D}$ write $H_ W( - ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(W, -)$. Then we get a commutative diagram of abelian groups

\[ \xymatrix{ H_ W(Z[-1]) \ar[r] \ar[d] & H_ W(X) \ar[r] \ar[d] & H_ W(Y) \ar[r] \ar[d] & H_ W(Z) \ar[r] \ar[d] & H_ W(X[1]) \ar[d] \\ H_ W(Z'[-1]) \ar[r] & H_ W(X') \ar[r] & H_ W(Y') \ar[r] & H_ W(Z') \ar[r] & H_ W(X'[1]) } \]

By assumption the right two and left two vertical arrows are bijective. As $H_ W$ is homological by Lemma 13.4.2 and the five lemma (Homology, Lemma 12.5.20) it follows that the middle vertical arrow is an isomorphism. Hence by Yoneda's lemma, see Categories, Lemma 4.3.5 we see that $b$ is an isomorphism. This implies the other cases by rotating (using TR2). $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: