Remark 13.4.4. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be an additive category with translation functors $[n]$ as in Definition 13.3.1. Let us call a triangle $(X, Y, Z, f, g, h)$ special1 if for every object $W$ of $\mathcal{D}$ the long sequence of abelian groups

$\ldots \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(W, X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(W, Y) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(W, Z) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(W, X[1]) \to \ldots$

is exact. The proof of Lemma 13.4.3 shows that if

$(a, b, c) : (X, Y, Z, f, g, h) \to (X', Y', Z', f', g', h')$

is a morphism of special triangles and if two among $a, b, c$ are isomorphisms so is the third. There is a dual statement for co-special triangles, i.e., triangles which turn into long exact sequences on applying the functor $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(-, W)$. Thus distinguished triangles are special and co-special, but in general there are many more (co-)special triangles, than there are distinguished triangles.

[1] This is nonstandard notation.

There are also:

• 13 comment(s) on Section 13.4: Elementary results on triangulated categories

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09WA. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.