The Stacks project

Lemma 12.29.5. Let $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ be abelian categories. Let $u : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ and $v : \mathcal{B} \to \mathcal{A}$ be additive functors. Assume

  1. $u$ is right adjoint to $v$,

  2. $v$ transforms injective maps into injective maps,

  3. $\mathcal{A}$ has enough injectives,

  4. $vB = 0$ implies $B = 0$ for any $B \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{B})$, and

  5. $\mathcal{A}$ has functorial injective hulls.

Then $\mathcal{B}$ has functorial injective hulls.

Proof. Let $A \mapsto (A \to J(A))$ be a functorial injective hull on $\mathcal{A}$. Then $B \mapsto (B \to uJ(vB))$ is a functorial injective hull on $\mathcal{B}$. Compare with the proof of Lemma 12.29.3. $\square$

Comments (1)

Comment #8494 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

:I have searched for the definition of "injective hull". It does not appear until 08Y2 (currently 47.5.1), and then only as an ad hoc version for modules.

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 12.29: Injectives and adjoint functors

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0161. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 12.29.5 as pdf