Lemma 14.27.1. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an additive category. Let $a, b : U \to V$ be morphisms of simplicial objects of $\mathcal{A}$. If $a$, $b$ are homotopic, then $s(a), s(b) : s(U) \to s(V)$ are homotopic maps of chain complexes. If $\mathcal{A}$ is abelian, then also $N(a), N(b) : N(U) \to N(V)$ are homotopic maps of chain complexes.

## 14.27 Homotopies in abelian categories

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an additive category. Let $U$, $V$ be simplicial objects of $\mathcal{A}$. Let $a, b : U \to V$ be morphisms. Further, suppose that $h : U \times \Delta [1] \to V$ is a homotopy from $a$ to $b$. Let us prove the two morphisms of chain complexes $s(a), s(b) : s(U) \longrightarrow s(V)$ are homotopic in the sense of Homology, Section 12.13. Using the notation introduced in Section 14.26 we define

by the formula

Let us compute $d_{n + 1} \circ s(h)_ n + s(h)_{n - 1} \circ d_ n$. We first compute

We leave it to the reader to see that the first and the last of the four sums cancel exactly against all the terms of

Hence we obtain

as desired.

**Proof.**
We may choose a sequence $a = a_0, a_1, \ldots , a_ n = b$ of morphisms from $U$ to $V$ such that for each $i = 1, \ldots , n$ either there is a homotopy from $a_ i$ to $a_{i - 1}$ or there is a homotopy from $a_{i - 1}$ to $a_ i$. The calculation above shows that in this case either $s(a_ i)$ is homotopic to $s(a_{i - 1})$ as a map of chain complexes or $s(a_{i - 1})$ is homotopic to $s(a_ i)$ as a map of chain complexes. Of course, these things are equivalent and moreover being homotopic is an equivalence relation on the set of maps of chain complexes, see Homology, Section 12.13. This proves that $s(a)$ and $s(b)$ are homotopic as maps of chain complexes.

Next, we turn to $N(a)$ and $N(b)$. It follows from Lemma 14.23.6 that $N(a)$, $N(b)$ are compositions

where we use $s(a)$, $s(b)$ in the middle. Hence the assertion follows from Homology, Lemma 12.13.1. $\square$

Lemma 14.27.2. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an additive category. Let $a : U \to V$ be a morphism of simplicial objects of $\mathcal{A}$. If $a$ is a homotopy equivalence, then $s(a) : s(U) \to s(V)$ is a homotopy equivalence of chain complexes. If in addition $\mathcal{A}$ is abelian, then also $N(a) : N(U) \to N(V)$ is a homotopy equivalence of chain complexes.

**Proof.**
Omitted. See Lemma 14.27.1 above.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)