Lemma 17.21.1. In the situation described above. The sheaf $\wedge ^ n\mathcal{F}$ is the sheafification of the presheaf

See Algebra, Section 10.13. Similarly, the sheaf $\text{Sym}^ n\mathcal{F}$ is the sheafification of the presheaf

Lemma 17.21.1. In the situation described above. The sheaf $\wedge ^ n\mathcal{F}$ is the sheafification of the presheaf

\[ U \longmapsto \wedge ^ n_{\mathcal{O}_ X(U)}(\mathcal{F}(U)). \]

See Algebra, Section 10.13. Similarly, the sheaf $\text{Sym}^ n\mathcal{F}$ is the sheafification of the presheaf

\[ U \longmapsto \text{Sym}^ n_{\mathcal{O}_ X(U)}(\mathcal{F}(U)). \]

**Proof.**
Omitted. It may be more efficient to define $\text{Sym}(\mathcal{F})$ and $\wedge (\mathcal{F})$ in this way instead of the method given above.
$\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: