The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

25.2 Locally ringed spaces

Recall that we defined ringed spaces in Sheaves, Section 6.25. Briefly, a ringed space is a pair $(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ consisting of a topological space $X$ and a sheaf of rings $\mathcal{O}_ X$. A morphism of ringed spaces $f : (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) \to (Y, \mathcal{O}_ Y)$ is given by a continuous map $f : X \to Y$ and an $f$-map of sheaves of rings $f^\sharp : \mathcal{O}_ Y \to \mathcal{O}_ X$. You can think of $f^\sharp $ as a map $\mathcal{O}_ Y \to f_*\mathcal{O}_ X$, see Sheaves, Definition 6.21.7 and Lemma 6.21.8.

A good geometric example of this to keep in mind is $\mathcal{C}^\infty $-manifolds and morphisms of $\mathcal{C}^\infty $-manifolds. Namely, if $M$ is a $\mathcal{C}^\infty $-manifold, then the sheaf $\mathcal{C}^\infty _ M$ of smooth functions is a sheaf of rings on $M$. And any map $f : M \to N$ of manifolds is smooth if and only if for every local section $h$ of $\mathcal{C}^\infty _ N$ the composition $h \circ f$ is a local section of $\mathcal{C}^\infty _ M$. Thus a smooth map $f$ gives rise in a natural way to a morphism of ringed spaces

\[ f : (M , \mathcal{C}^\infty _ M) \longrightarrow (N, \mathcal{C}^\infty _ N) \]

see Sheaves, Example 6.25.2. It is instructive to consider what happens to stalks. Namely, let $m \in M$ with image $f(m) = n \in N$. Recall that the stalk $\mathcal{C}^\infty _{M, m}$ is the ring of germs of smooth functions at $m$, see Sheaves, Example 6.11.4. The algebra of germs of functions on $(M, m)$ is a local ring with maximal ideal the functions which vanish at $m$. Similarly for $\mathcal{C}^\infty _{N, n}$. The map on stalks $f^\sharp : \mathcal{C}^\infty _{N, n} \to \mathcal{C}^\infty _{M, m}$ maps the maximal ideal into the maximal ideal, simply because $f(m) = n$.

In algebraic geometry we study schemes. On a scheme the sheaf of rings is not determined by an intrinsic property of the space. The spectrum of a ring $R$ (see Algebra, Section 10.16) endowed with a sheaf of rings constructed out of $R$ (see below), will be our basic building block. It will turn out that the stalks of $\mathcal{O}$ on $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ are the local rings of $R$ at its primes. There are two reasons to introduce locally ringed spaces in this setting: (1) There is in general no mechanism that assigns to a continuous map of spectra a map of the corresponding rings. This is why we add as an extra datum the map $f^\sharp $. (2) If we consider morphisms of these spectra in the category of ringed spaces, then the maps on stalks may not be local homomorphisms. Since our geometric intuition says it should we introduce locally ringed spaces as follows.

Definition 25.2.1. Locally ringed spaces.

  1. A locally ringed space $(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ is a pair consisting of a topological space $X$ and a sheaf of rings $\mathcal{O}_ X$ all of whose stalks are local rings.

  2. Given a locally ringed space $(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ we say that $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is the local ring of $X$ at $x$. We denote $\mathfrak {m}_{X, x}$ or simply $\mathfrak {m}_ x$ the maximal ideal of $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$. Moreover, the residue field of $X$ at $x$ is the residue field $\kappa (x) = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak {m}_ x$.

  3. A morphism of locally ringed spaces $(f, f^\sharp ) : (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) \to (Y, \mathcal{O}_ Y)$ is a morphism of ringed spaces such that for all $x \in X$ the induced ring map $\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is a local ring map.

We will usually suppress the sheaf of rings $\mathcal{O}_ X$ in the notation when discussing locally ringed spaces. We will simply refer to “the locally ringed space $X$”. We will by abuse of notation think of $X$ also as the underlying topological space. Finally we will denote the corresponding sheaf of rings $\mathcal{O}_ X$ as the structure sheaf of $X$. In addition, it is customary to denote the maximal ideal of the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ by $\mathfrak {m}_{X, x}$ or simply $\mathfrak {m}_ x$. We will say “let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of locally ringed spaces” thereby suppressing the structure sheaves even further. In this case, we will by abuse of notation think of $f : X\to Y$ also as the underlying continuous map of topological spaces. The $f$-map corresponding to $f$ will customarily be denoted $f^\sharp $. The condition that $f$ is a morphism of locally ringed spaces can then be expressed by saying that for every $x\in X$ the map on stalks

\[ f^\sharp _ x : \mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \]

maps the maximal ideal $\mathfrak m_{Y, f(x)}$ into $\mathfrak m_{X, x}$.

Let us use these notational conventions to show that the collection of locally ringed spaces and morphisms of locally ringed spaces forms a category. In order to see this we have to show that the composition of morphisms of locally ringed spaces is a morphism of locally ringed spaces. OK, so let $f : X \to Y$ and $g : Y \to Z$ be morphism of locally ringed spaces. The composition of $f$ and $g$ is defined in Sheaves, Definition 6.25.3. Let $x \in X$. By Sheaves, Lemma 6.21.10 the composition

\[ \mathcal{O}_{Z, g(f(x))} \xrightarrow {g^\sharp } \mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)} \xrightarrow {f^\sharp } \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \]

is the associated map on stalks for the morphism $g \circ f$. The result follows since a composition of local ring homomorphisms is a local ring homomorphism.

A pleasing feature of the definition is the fact that the functor

\[ \textit{Locally ringed spaces} \longrightarrow \textit{Ringed spaces} \]

reflects isomorphisms (plus more). Here is a less abstract statement.

slogan

Lemma 25.2.2. Let $X$, $Y$ be locally ringed spaces. If $f : X \to Y$ is an isomorphism of ringed spaces, then $f$ is an isomorphism of locally ringed spaces.

Proof. This follows trivially from the corresponding fact in algebra: Suppose $A$, $B$ are local rings. Any isomorphism of rings $A \to B$ is a local ring homomorphism. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01HA. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.