Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 30.7.3. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent sheaf on X. Assume that f is quasi-compact and quasi-separated and that S is quasi-compact and separated. There exists a bounded below complex \mathcal{K}^\bullet of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ S-modules with the following property: For every morphism g : S' \to S the complex g^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet is a representative for Rf'_*\mathcal{F}' with notation as in diagram (30.5.0.1).

Proof. (If f is separated as well, please see Lemma 30.7.2.) The assumptions imply in particular that X is quasi-compact and quasi-separated as a scheme. Let \mathcal{B} be the set of affine opens of X. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.11.4 we can find a hypercovering K = (I, \{ U_ i\} ) such that each I_ n is finite and each U_ i is an affine open of X. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.5.3 there is a spectral sequence with E_2-page

E_2^{p, q} = \check{H}^ p(K, \underline{H}^ q(\mathcal{F}))

converging to H^{p + q}(X, \mathcal{F}). Note that \check{H}^ p(K, \underline{H}^ q(\mathcal{F})) is the pth cohomology group of the complex

\prod \nolimits _{i \in I_0} H^ q(U_ i, \mathcal{F}) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_1} H^ q(U_ i, \mathcal{F}) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_2} H^ q(U_ i, \mathcal{F}) \to \ldots

Since each U_ i is affine we see that this is zero unless q = 0 in which case we obtain

\prod \nolimits _{i \in I_0} \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_1} \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_2} \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \ldots

Thus we conclude that R\Gamma (X, \mathcal{F}) is computed by this complex.

For any n and i \in I_ n denote f_ i : U_ i \to S the restriction of f to U_ i. As S is separated and U_ i is affine this morphism is affine. Consider the complex of quasi-coherent sheaves

\mathcal{K}^\bullet = ( \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_0} f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_1} f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_2} f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \to \ldots )

on S. As in Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.5.3 we obtain a map \mathcal{K}^\bullet \to Rf_*\mathcal{F} in D(\mathcal{O}_ S) by choosing an injective resolution of \mathcal{F} (details omitted). Consider any affine scheme V and a morphism g : V \to S. Then the base change X_ V has a hypercovering K_ V = (I, \{ U_{i, V}\} ) obtained by base change. Moreover, g^*f_{i, *}\mathcal{F} = f_{i, V, *}(g')^*\mathcal{F}|_{U_{i, V}}. Thus the arguments above prove that \Gamma (V, g^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet ) computes R\Gamma (X_ V, (g')^*\mathcal{F}). This finishes the proof of the lemma as it suffices to prove the equality of complexes Zariski locally on S'. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.