The Stacks project

30.7 Cohomology and base change, II

Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. If $f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated we would like to represent $Rf_*\mathcal{F}$ by a complex of quasi-coherent sheaves on $S$. This follows from the fact that the sheaves $R^ if_*\mathcal{F}$ are quasi-coherent if $S$ is quasi-compact and has affine diagonal, using that $D_\mathit{QCoh}(S)$ is equivalent to $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ S))$, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Proposition 36.7.5.

In this section we will use a different approach which produces an explicit complex having a good base change property. The construction is particularly easy if $f$ and $S$ are separated, or more generally have affine diagonal. Since this is the case which by far the most often used we treat it separately.

Lemma 30.7.1. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Assume $X$ is quasi-compact and $X$ and $S$ have affine diagonal (e.g., if $X$ and $S$ are separated). In this case we can compute $Rf_*\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

  1. Choose a finite affine open covering $\mathcal{U} : X = \bigcup _{i = 1, \ldots , n} U_ i$.

  2. For $i_0, \ldots , i_ p \in \{ 1, \ldots , n\} $ denote $f_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} : U_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} \to S$ the restriction of $f$ to the intersection $U_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} = U_{i_0} \cap \ldots \cap U_{i_ p}$.

  3. Set $\mathcal{F}_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}$ equal to the restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to $U_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}$.

  4. Set

    \[ \check{\mathcal{C}}^ p(\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) = \bigoplus \nolimits _{i_0 \ldots i_ p} f_{i_0 \ldots i_ p *} \mathcal{F}_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} \]

    and define differentials $d : \check{\mathcal{C}}^ p(\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) \to \check{\mathcal{C}}^{p + 1}(\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F})$ as in Cohomology, Equation (

Then the complex $\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F})$ is a complex of quasi-coherent sheaves on $S$ which comes equipped with an isomorphism

\[ \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow Rf_*\mathcal{F} \]

in $D^{+}(S)$. This isomorphism is functorial in the quasi-coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$.

Proof. Consider the resolution $\mathcal{F} \to {\mathfrak C}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$ of Cohomology, Lemma 20.24.1. We have an equality of complexes $\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) = f_*{\mathfrak C}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$ of quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-modules. The morphisms $j_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} : U_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} \to X$ and the morphisms $f_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} : U_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} \to S$ are affine by Morphisms, Lemma 29.11.11 and Lemma 30.2.5. Hence $R^ qj_{i_0 \ldots i_ p *}\mathcal{F}_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}$ as well as $R^ qf_{i_0 \ldots i_ p *}\mathcal{F}_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}$ are zero for $q > 0$ (Lemma 30.2.3). Using $f \circ j_{i_0 \ldots i_ p} = f_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}$ and the spectral sequence of Cohomology, Lemma 20.13.8 we conclude that $R^ qf_*(j_{i_0 \ldots i_ p *}\mathcal{F}_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}) = 0$ for $q > 0$. Since the terms of the complex ${\mathfrak C}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$ are finite direct sums of the sheaves $j_{i_0 \ldots i_ p *}\mathcal{F}_{i_0 \ldots i_ p}$ we conclude using Leray's acyclicity lemma (Derived Categories, Lemma 13.16.7) that

\[ Rf_* \mathcal{F} = f_*{\mathfrak C}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F}) = \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) \]

as desired. $\square$

Next, we are going to consider what happens if we do a base change.

Lemma 30.7.2. With notation as in diagram ( Assume $f : X \to S$ and $\mathcal{F}$ satisfy the hypotheses of Lemma 30.7.1. Choose a finite affine open covering $\mathcal{U} : X = \bigcup U_ i$ of $X$. There is a canonical isomorphism

\[ g^*\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow Rf'_*\mathcal{F}' \]

in $D^{+}(S')$. Moreover, if $S' \to S$ is affine, then in fact

\[ g^*\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) = \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}', f', \mathcal{F}') \]

with $\mathcal{U}' : X' = \bigcup U_ i'$ where $U_ i' = (g')^{-1}(U_ i) = U_{i, S'}$ is also affine.

Proof. In fact we may define $U_ i' = (g')^{-1}(U_ i) = U_{i, S'}$ no matter whether $S'$ is affine over $S$ or not. Let $\mathcal{U}' : X' = \bigcup U_ i'$ be the induced covering of $X'$. In this case we claim that

\[ g^*\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) = \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}', f', \mathcal{F}') \]

with $\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}', f', \mathcal{F}')$ defined in exactly the same manner as in Lemma 30.7.1. This is clear from the case of affine morphisms (Lemma 30.5.1) by working locally on $S'$. Moreover, exactly as in the proof of Lemma 30.7.1 one sees that there is an isomorphism

\[ \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}', f', \mathcal{F}') \longrightarrow Rf'_*\mathcal{F}' \]

in $D^{+}(S')$ since the morphisms $U_ i' \to X'$ and $U_ i' \to S'$ are still affine (being base changes of affine morphisms). Details omitted. $\square$

The lemma above says that the complex

\[ \mathcal{K}^\bullet = \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F}) \]

is a bounded below complex of quasi-coherent sheaves on $S$ which universally computes the higher direct images of $f : X \to S$. This is something about this particular complex and it is not preserved by replacing $\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, f, \mathcal{F})$ by a quasi-isomorphic complex in general! In other words, this is not a statement that makes sense in the derived category. The reason is that the pullback $g^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ is not equal to the derived pullback $Lg^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ in general!

Here is a more general case where we can prove this statement. We remark that the condition of $S$ being separated is harmless in most applications, since this is usually used to prove some local property of the total derived image. The proof is significantly more involved and uses hypercoverings; it is a nice example of how you can use them sometimes.

Lemma 30.7.3. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$. Assume that $f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated and that $S$ is quasi-compact and separated. There exists a bounded below complex $\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ of quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-modules with the following property: For every morphism $g : S' \to S$ the complex $g^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ is a representative for $Rf'_*\mathcal{F}'$ with notation as in diagram (

Proof. (If $f$ is separated as well, please see Lemma 30.7.2.) The assumptions imply in particular that $X$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated as a scheme. Let $\mathcal{B}$ be the set of affine opens of $X$. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.11.4 we can find a hypercovering $K = (I, \{ U_ i\} )$ such that each $I_ n$ is finite and each $U_ i$ is an affine open of $X$. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.5.3 there is a spectral sequence with $E_2$-page

\[ E_2^{p, q} = \check{H}^ p(K, \underline{H}^ q(\mathcal{F})) \]

converging to $H^{p + q}(X, \mathcal{F})$. Note that $\check{H}^ p(K, \underline{H}^ q(\mathcal{F}))$ is the $p$th cohomology group of the complex

\[ \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_0} H^ q(U_ i, \mathcal{F}) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_1} H^ q(U_ i, \mathcal{F}) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_2} H^ q(U_ i, \mathcal{F}) \to \ldots \]

Since each $U_ i$ is affine we see that this is zero unless $q = 0$ in which case we obtain

\[ \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_0} \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_1} \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_2} \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \ldots \]

Thus we conclude that $R\Gamma (X, \mathcal{F})$ is computed by this complex.

For any $n$ and $i \in I_ n$ denote $f_ i : U_ i \to S$ the restriction of $f$ to $U_ i$. As $S$ is separated and $U_ i$ is affine this morphism is affine. Consider the complex of quasi-coherent sheaves

\[ \mathcal{K}^\bullet = ( \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_0} f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_1} f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \to \prod \nolimits _{i \in I_2} f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \to \ldots ) \]

on $S$. As in Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.5.3 we obtain a map $\mathcal{K}^\bullet \to Rf_*\mathcal{F}$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_ S)$ by choosing an injective resolution of $\mathcal{F}$ (details omitted). Consider any affine scheme $V$ and a morphism $g : V \to S$. Then the base change $X_ V$ has a hypercovering $K_ V = (I, \{ U_{i, V}\} )$ obtained by base change. Moreover, $g^*f_{i, *}\mathcal{F} = f_{i, V, *}(g')^*\mathcal{F}|_{U_{i, V}}$. Thus the arguments above prove that $\Gamma (V, g^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet )$ computes $R\Gamma (X_ V, (g')^*\mathcal{F})$. This finishes the proof of the lemma as it suffices to prove the equality of complexes Zariski locally on $S'$. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 071M. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.