## Tag `01XZ`

Chapter 29: Cohomology of Schemes > Section 29.9: Coherent sheaves on locally Noetherian schemes

Lemma 29.9.1. Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. The following are equivalent

- $\mathcal{F}$ is coherent,
- $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent, finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module,
- $\mathcal{F}$ is a finitely presented $\mathcal{O}_X$-module,
- for any affine open $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) = U \subset X$ we have $\mathcal{F}|_U = \widetilde M$ with $M$ a finite $A$-module, and
- there exists an affine open covering $X = \bigcup U_i$, $U_i = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_i)$ such that each $\mathcal{F}|_{U_i} = \widetilde M_i$ with $M_i$ a finite $A_i$-module.
In particular $\mathcal{O}_X$ is coherent, any invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module is coherent, and more generally any finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_X$-module is coherent.

Proof.The implications (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) and (1) $\Rightarrow$ (3) hold in general, see Modules, Lemma 17.12.2. If $\mathcal{F}$ is finitely presented then $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent, see Modules, Lemma 17.11.2. Hence also (3) $\Rightarrow$ (2).Assume $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent, finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. By Properties, Lemma 27.16.1 we see that on any affine open $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) = U \subset X$ we have $\mathcal{F}|_U = \widetilde M$ with $M$ a finite $A$-module. Since $A$ is Noetherian we see that $M$ has a finite resolution $$ A^{\oplus m} \to A^{\oplus n} \to M \to 0. $$ Hence $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation by Properties, Lemma 27.16.2. In other words (2) $\Rightarrow$ (3).

By Modules, Lemma 17.12.5 it suffices to show that $\mathcal{O}_X$ is coherent in order to show that (3) implies (1). Thus we have to show: given any open $U \subset X$ and any finite collection of sections $f_i \in \mathcal{O}_X(U)$, $i = 1, \ldots, n$ the kernel of the map $\bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, n} \mathcal{O}_U \to \mathcal{O}_U$ is of finite type. Since being of finite type is a local property it suffices to check this in a neighbourhood of any $x \in U$. Thus we may assume $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is affine. In this case $f_1, \ldots, f_n \in A$ are elements of $A$. Since $A$ is Noetherian, see Properties, Lemma 27.5.2 the kernel $K$ of the map $\bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, n} A \to A$ is a finite $A$-module. See for example Algebra, Lemma 10.50.1. As the functor $\widetilde{ }$ is exact, see Schemes, Lemma 25.5.4 we get an exact sequence $$ \widetilde K \to \bigoplus\nolimits_{i = 1, \ldots, n} \mathcal{O}_U \to \mathcal{O}_U $$ and by Properties, Lemma 27.16.1 again we see that $\widetilde K$ is of finite type. We conclude that (1), (2) and (3) are all equivalent.

It follows from Properties, Lemma 27.16.1 that (2) implies (4). It is trivial that (4) implies (5). The discussion in Schemes, Section 25.24 show that (5) implies that $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent and it is clear that (5) implies that $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite type. Hence (5) implies (2) and we win. $\square$

The code snippet corresponding to this tag is a part of the file `coherent.tex` and is located in lines 2025–2043 (see updates for more information).

```
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-coherent-Noetherian}
Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is coherent,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent, finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is a finitely presented $\mathcal{O}_X$-module,
\item for any affine open $\Spec(A) = U \subset X$ we have
$\mathcal{F}|_U = \widetilde M$ with $M$ a finite $A$-module, and
\item there exists an affine open covering $X = \bigcup U_i$,
$U_i = \Spec(A_i)$ such that each
$\mathcal{F}|_{U_i} = \widetilde M_i$ with $M_i$ a finite $A_i$-module.
\end{enumerate}
In particular $\mathcal{O}_X$ is coherent, any invertible
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module is coherent, and more generally any
finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_X$-module is coherent.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The implications (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) and (1) $\Rightarrow$ (3) hold
in general, see
Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-coherent-finite-presentation}.
If $\mathcal{F}$ is finitely presented then $\mathcal{F}$ is
quasi-coherent, see
Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-finite-presentation-quasi-coherent}.
Hence also (3) $\Rightarrow$ (2).
\medskip\noindent
Assume $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent, finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
By
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-type-module}
we see that on any affine open
$\Spec(A) = U \subset X$ we have $\mathcal{F}|_U = \widetilde M$
with $M$ a finite $A$-module. Since $A$ is Noetherian we see that
$M$ has a finite resolution
$$
A^{\oplus m} \to A^{\oplus n} \to M \to 0.
$$
Hence $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation by
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-presentation-module}.
In other words (2) $\Rightarrow$ (3).
\medskip\noindent
By Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-coherent-structure-sheaf} it suffices
to show that $\mathcal{O}_X$ is coherent in order to show that (3)
implies (1). Thus we have to show: given any open $U \subset X$ and
any finite collection of sections $f_i \in \mathcal{O}_X(U)$,
$i = 1, \ldots, n$ the kernel of the map
$\bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, n} \mathcal{O}_U \to \mathcal{O}_U$
is of finite type. Since being of finite type is a local property
it suffices to check this in a neighbourhood of any $x \in U$.
Thus we may assume $U = \Spec(A)$ is affine. In this case
$f_1, \ldots, f_n \in A$ are elements of $A$. Since $A$ is
Noetherian, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-locally-Noetherian}
the kernel $K$ of the map $\bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, n} A \to A$
is a finite $A$-module. See for example
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-Noetherian-basic}.
As the functor\ $\widetilde{ }$\ is exact, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-spec-sheaves}
we get an exact sequence
$$
\widetilde K \to
\bigoplus\nolimits_{i = 1, \ldots, n} \mathcal{O}_U \to
\mathcal{O}_U
$$
and by
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-type-module}
again we see that $\widetilde K$ is of finite type. We conclude
that (1), (2) and (3) are all equivalent.
\medskip\noindent
It follows from
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-type-module}
that (2) implies (4). It is trivial that (4) implies (5).
The discussion in
Schemes, Section \ref{schemes-section-quasi-coherent}
show that (5) implies
that $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent and it is clear that (5)
implies that $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite type. Hence (5) implies
(2) and we win.
\end{proof}
```

## Comments (0)

## Add a comment on tag `01XZ`

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

There are no comments yet for this tag.