Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Lemma 30.13.2. Let f : Y \to X be a morphism of schemes. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent sheaf on Y. Let \mathcal{I} be a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals on X. If the morphism f is affine then \mathcal{I}f_*\mathcal{F} = f_*(f^{-1}\mathcal{I}\mathcal{F}).

Proof. The notation means the following. Since f^{-1} is an exact functor we see that f^{-1}\mathcal{I} is a sheaf of ideals of f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ X. Via the map f^\sharp : f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ X \to \mathcal{O}_ Y this acts on \mathcal{F}. Then f^{-1}\mathcal{I}\mathcal{F} is the subsheaf generated by sums of local sections of the form as where a is a local section of f^{-1}\mathcal{I} and s is a local section of \mathcal{F}. It is a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ Y-submodule of \mathcal{F} because it is also the image of a natural map f^*\mathcal{I} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ Y} \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}.

Having said this the proof is straightforward. Namely, the question is local and hence we may assume X is affine. Since f is affine we see that Y is affine too. Thus we may write Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B), X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A), \mathcal{F} = \widetilde{M}, and \mathcal{I} = \widetilde{I}. The assertion of the lemma in this case boils down to the statement that

I(M_ A) = ((IB)M)_ A

where M_ A indicates the A-module associated to the B-module M. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 30.13: Finite morphisms and affines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.