Lemma 85.30.1. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\pi : Y \to (X/S)_\bullet$ be a cartesian morphism of simplicial schemes, see Definitions 85.27.1 and 85.27.3. Then the morphism

$j = (d^1_1, d^1_0) : Y_1 \to Y_0 \times _ S Y_0$

defines an equivalence relation on $Y_0$ over $S$, see Groupoids, Definition 39.3.1.

Proof. Note that $j$ is a monomorphism. Namely the composition $Y_1 \to Y_0 \times _ S Y_0 \to Y_0 \times _ S X$ is an isomorphism as $\pi$ is cartesian.

Consider the morphism

$(d^2_2, d^2_0) : Y_2 \to Y_1 \times _{d^1_0, Y_0, d^1_1} Y_1.$

This works because $d_0 \circ d_2 = d_1 \circ d_0$, see Simplicial, Remark 14.3.3. Also, it is a morphism over $(X/S)_2$. It is an isomorphism because $Y \to (X/S)_\bullet$ is cartesian. Note for example that the right hand side is isomorphic to $Y_0 \times _{\pi _0, X, \text{pr}_1} (X \times _ S X \times _ S X) = X \times _ S Y_0 \times _ S X$ because $\pi$ is cartesian. Details omitted.

As in Groupoids, Definition 39.3.1 we denote $t = \text{pr}_0 \circ j = d^1_1$ and $s = \text{pr}_1 \circ j = d^1_0$. The isomorphism above, combined with the morphism $d^2_1 : Y_2 \to Y_1$ give us a composition morphism

$c : Y_1 \times _{s, Y_0, t} Y_1 \longrightarrow Y_1$

over $Y_0 \times _ S Y_0$. This immediately implies that for any scheme $T/S$ the relation $Y_1(T) \subset Y_0(T) \times Y_0(T)$ is transitive.

Reflexivity follows from the fact that the restriction of the morphism $j$ to the diagonal $\Delta : X \to X \times _ S X$ is an isomorphism (again use the cartesian property of $\pi$).

To see symmetry we consider the morphism

$(d^2_2, d^2_1) : Y_2 \to Y_1 \times _{d^1_1, Y_0, d^1_1} Y_1.$

This works because $d_1 \circ d_2 = d_1 \circ d_1$, see Simplicial, Remark 14.3.3. It is an isomorphism because $Y \to (X/S)_\bullet$ is cartesian. Note for example that the right hand side is isomorphic to $Y_0 \times _{\pi _0, X, \text{pr}_0} (X \times _ S X \times _ S X) = Y_0 \times _ S X \times _ S X$ because $\pi$ is cartesian. Details omitted.

Let $T/S$ be a scheme. Let $a \sim b$ for $a, b \in Y_0(T)$ be synonymous with $(a, b) \in Y_1(T)$. The isomorphism $(d^2_2, d^2_1)$ above implies that if $a \sim b$ and $a \sim c$, then $b \sim c$. Combined with reflexivity this shows that $\sim$ is an equivalence relation. $\square$

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 024E. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.