The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

Lemma 10.73.1. Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring. Let $I \subset R$ be an ideal contained in the Jacobson radical of $R$. Let $N \to M$ be a homomorphism of finite $R$-modules. Suppose that there exists arbitrarily large $n$ such that $N/I^ nN \to M/I^ nM$ is a split injection. Then $N \to M$ is a split injection.

Proof. Assume $\varphi : N \to M$ satisfies the assumptions of the lemma. Note that this implies that $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ) \subset I^ nN$ for arbitrarily large $n$. Hence by Lemma 10.50.5 we see that $\varphi $ is injection. Let $Q = M/N$ so that we have a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to N \to M \to Q \to 0. \]

Let

\[ F_2 \xrightarrow {d_2} F_1 \xrightarrow {d_1} F_0 \to Q \to 0 \]

be a finite free resolution of $Q$. We can choose a map $\alpha : F_0 \to M$ lifting the map $F_0 \to Q$. This induces a map $\beta : F_1 \to N$ such that $\beta \circ d_2 = 0$. The extension above is split if and only if there exists a map $\gamma : F_0 \to N$ such that $\beta = \gamma \circ d_1$. In other words, the class of $\beta $ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_ R(Q, N)$ is the obstruction to splitting the short exact sequence above.

Suppose $n$ is a large integer such that $N/I^ nN \to M/I^ nM$ is a split injection. This implies

\[ 0 \to N/I^ nN \to M/I^ nM \to Q/I^ nQ \to 0. \]

is still short exact. Also, the sequence

\[ F_1/I^ nF_1 \xrightarrow {d_1} F_0/I^ nF_0 \to Q/I^ nQ \to 0 \]

is still exact. Arguing as above we see that the map $\overline{\beta } : F_1/I^ nF_1 \to N/I^ nN$ induced by $\beta $ is equal to $\gamma _ n \circ d_1$ for some map $\overline{\gamma _ n} : F_0/I^ nF_0 \to N/I^ n$. Since $F_0$ is free we can lift $\overline{\gamma _ n}$ to a map $\gamma _ n : F_0 \to N$ and then we see that $\beta - \gamma _ n \circ d_1$ is a map from $F_1$ into $I^ nN$. In other words we conclude that

\[ \beta \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\Big(\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_0, N) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_1, N)\Big) + I^ n\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_1, N). \]

for this $n$.

Since we have this property for arbitrarily large $n$ by assumption we conclude that the image of $\beta $ in the cokernel of $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_0, N) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_1, N)$ is zero by Lemma 10.50.5. Hence $\beta $ is in the image of the map $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_0, N) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_1, N)$ as desired. $\square$


Comments (3)

Comment #1938 by Brian Conrad on

The same proof works verbatim with a noetherian ring (not necessarily local) and any ideal in the Jacobson radical. This applies in particular for a noetherian complete with respect to an ideal . It seems nice to avoid locality when setting up the general adic-style theorems whenever possible.

P.S. This is Tag 02HO, a rather heinous mixture of "0" and "O" that made it hard to pass the "I am not a bot" test until looking closely at the URL for this page to figure out what was going on. Can you make a computer search on all tags containing both 0 and O and making the tag typography for those show the distinction in the letters more clearly?

Comment #1940 by on

@Brian: That is actually a very good idea, I will implement this in the next round of bugfixing, which should happen soon. Thanks!

Comment #1995 by on

@#1938 Thanks very much. I have made the corresponding changes here.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02HO. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.