Lemma 10.74.1. Let R be a Noetherian ring. Let I \subset R be an ideal contained in the Jacobson radical of R. Let N \to M be a homomorphism of finite R-modules. Suppose that there exists arbitrarily large n such that N/I^ nN \to M/I^ nM is a split injection. Then N \to M is a split injection.
10.74 An application of Ext groups
Here it is.
Proof. Assume \varphi : N \to M satisfies the assumptions of the lemma. Note that this implies that \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ) \subset I^ nN for arbitrarily large n. Hence by Lemma 10.51.5 we see that \varphi is injection. Let Q = M/N so that we have a short exact sequence
Let
be a finite free resolution of Q. We can choose a map \alpha : F_0 \to M lifting the map F_0 \to Q. This induces a map \beta : F_1 \to N such that \beta \circ d_2 = 0. The extension above is split if and only if there exists a map \gamma : F_0 \to N such that \beta = \gamma \circ d_1. In other words, the class of \beta in \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_ R(Q, N) is the obstruction to splitting the short exact sequence above.
Suppose n is a large integer such that N/I^ nN \to M/I^ nM is a split injection. This implies
is still short exact. Also, the sequence
is still exact. Arguing as above we see that the map \overline{\beta } : F_1/I^ nF_1 \to N/I^ nN induced by \beta is equal to \overline{\gamma _ n} \circ d_1 for some map \overline{\gamma _ n} : F_0/I^ nF_0 \to N/I^ nN. Since F_0 is free we can lift \overline{\gamma _ n} to a map \gamma _ n : F_0 \to N and then we see that \beta - \gamma _ n \circ d_1 is a map from F_1 into I^ nN. In other words we conclude that
for this n.
Since we have this property for arbitrarily large n by assumption we conclude that the image of \beta in the cokernel of \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_0, N) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_1, N) is zero by Lemma 10.51.5. Hence \beta is in the image of the map \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_0, N) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ R(F_1, N) as desired. \square
Comments (3)
Comment #6547 by wqx on
Comment #6548 by wqx on
Comment #6595 by Johan on