The Stacks project

Lemma 27.5.9. Any nonempty locally Noetherian scheme has a closed point. Any nonempty closed subset of a locally Noetherian scheme has a closed point. Equivalently, any point of a locally Noetherian scheme specializes to a closed point.

Proof. The second assertion follows from the first (using Schemes, Lemma 25.12.4 and Lemma 27.5.6). Consider any nonempty affine open $U \subset X$. Let $x \in U$ be a closed point. If $x$ is a closed point of $X$ then we are done. If not, let $X_0 \subset X$ be the reduced induced closed subscheme structure on $\overline{\{ x\} }$. Then $U_0 = U \cap X_0$ is an affine open of $X_0$ by Schemes, Lemma 25.10.1 and $U_0 = \{ x\} $. Let $y \in X_0$, $y \not= x$ be a specialization of $x$. Consider the local ring $R = \mathcal{O}_{X_0, y}$. This is a Noetherian local ring as $X_0$ is Noetherian by Lemma 27.5.6. Denote $V \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ the inverse image of $U_0$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ by the canonical morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \to X_0$ (see Schemes, Section 25.13.) By construction $V$ is a singleton with unique point corresponding to $x$ (use Schemes, Lemma 25.13.2). By Algebra, Lemma 10.60.1 we see that $\dim (R) = 1$. In other words, we see that $y$ is an immediate specialization of $x$ (see Topology, Definition 5.20.1). In other words, any point $y \not= x$ such that $x \leadsto y$ is an immediate specialization of $x$. Clearly each of these points is a closed point as desired. $\square$


Comments (4)

Comment #447 by Qing Liu on

Hi, I think there is some flaw in the proof (that is a singleton). If we identify Spec() with its image in , then is the set of points of which specializes to . In general is bigger than , thus is not a singleton (example: equal to the affine line over a DVR, its generic fiber, a closed point of specializing to the origin of the closed fiber; then is a kind of open unit disk). However, the proof can be easily repaired by replacing with (say with the reduced structure) and with . In the new situation, is an integral scheme, its generic point is open. Then the same argument shows that has dimension .

Comment #449 by on

Oops! Yes. What a bizarre error. Thanks! If you come by before I run out of them, I'll give you a Stacks project mug. Fixed here.

Comment #1073 by Antoine Chambert-Loir on

Second statement has to be corrected: every non-empty closed subset... contains a closed point. (Sorry...)

Comment #1077 by on

Yes, indeed! Also, it seems your name hadn't been added to the list of contributors yet and I've done so this time. Thanks! The change is here.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 27.5: Noetherian schemes

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02IL. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.