Lemma 29.51.1. Let X, Y be schemes. Let f : X \to Y be locally of finite type. Let \eta \in Y be a generic point of an irreducible component of Y. The following are equivalent:
the set f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) is finite,
there exist affine opens U_ i \subset X, i = 1, \ldots , n and V \subset Y with f(U_ i) \subset V, \eta \in V and f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) \subset \bigcup U_ i such that each f|_{U_ i} : U_ i \to V is finite.
If f is quasi-separated, then these are also equivalent to
there exist affine opens V \subset Y, and U \subset X with f(U) \subset V, \eta \in V and f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) \subset U such that f|_ U : U \to V is finite.
If f is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, then these are also equivalent to
there exists an affine open V \subset Y, \eta \in V such that f^{-1}(V) \to V is finite.
Proof.
The question is local on the base. Hence we may replace Y by an affine neighbourhood of \eta , and we may and do assume throughout the proof below that Y is affine, say Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R).
It is clear that (2) implies (1). Assume that f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) = \{ \xi _1, \ldots , \xi _ n\} is finite. Choose affine opens U_ i \subset X with \xi _ i \in U_ i. By Algebra, Lemma 10.122.10 we see that after replacing Y by a standard open in Y each of the morphisms U_ i \to Y is finite. In other words (2) holds.
It is clear that (3) implies (1). Assume f is quasi-separated and (1). Write f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) = \{ \xi _1, \ldots , \xi _ n\} . There are no specializations among the \xi _ i by Lemma 29.20.7. Since each \xi _ i maps to the generic point \eta of an irreducible component of Y, there cannot be a nontrivial specialization \xi \leadsto \xi _ i in X (since \xi would map to \eta as well). We conclude each \xi _ i is a generic point of an irreducible component of X. Since Y is affine and f quasi-separated we see X is quasi-separated. By Properties, Lemma 28.29.1 we can find an affine open U \subset X containing each \xi _ i. By Algebra, Lemma 10.122.10 we see that after replacing Y by a standard open in Y the morphisms U \to Y is finite. In other words (3) holds.
It is clear that (4) implies all of (1) β (3) with no further assumptions on f. Suppose that f is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. We have to show that the equivalent conditions (1) β (3) imply (4). Let U, V be as in (3). Replace Y by V. Since f is quasi-compact and Y is quasi-compact (being affine) we see that X is quasi-compact. Hence Z = X \setminus U is quasi-compact, hence the morphism f|_ Z : Z \to Y is quasi-compact. By construction of Z we see that \eta \not\in f(Z). Hence by Lemma 29.8.5 we see that there exists an affine open neighbourhood V' of \eta in Y such that f^{-1}(V') \cap Z = \emptyset . Then we have f^{-1}(V') \subset U and this means that f^{-1}(V') \to V' is finite.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: