Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Lemma 29.51.1. Let X, Y be schemes. Let f : X \to Y be locally of finite type. Let \eta \in Y be a generic point of an irreducible component of Y. The following are equivalent:

  1. the set f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) is finite,

  2. there exist affine opens U_ i \subset X, i = 1, \ldots , n and V \subset Y with f(U_ i) \subset V, \eta \in V and f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) \subset \bigcup U_ i such that each f|_{U_ i} : U_ i \to V is finite.

If f is quasi-separated, then these are also equivalent to

  1. there exist affine opens V \subset Y, and U \subset X with f(U) \subset V, \eta \in V and f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) \subset U such that f|_ U : U \to V is finite.

If f is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, then these are also equivalent to

  1. there exists an affine open V \subset Y, \eta \in V such that f^{-1}(V) \to V is finite.

Proof. The question is local on the base. Hence we may replace Y by an affine neighbourhood of \eta , and we may and do assume throughout the proof below that Y is affine, say Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R).

It is clear that (2) implies (1). Assume that f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) = \{ \xi _1, \ldots , \xi _ n\} is finite. Choose affine opens U_ i \subset X with \xi _ i \in U_ i. By Algebra, Lemma 10.122.10 we see that after replacing Y by a standard open in Y each of the morphisms U_ i \to Y is finite. In other words (2) holds.

It is clear that (3) implies (1). Assume f is quasi-separated and (1). Write f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) = \{ \xi _1, \ldots , \xi _ n\} . There are no specializations among the \xi _ i by Lemma 29.20.7. Since each \xi _ i maps to the generic point \eta of an irreducible component of Y, there cannot be a nontrivial specialization \xi \leadsto \xi _ i in X (since \xi would map to \eta as well). We conclude each \xi _ i is a generic point of an irreducible component of X. Since Y is affine and f quasi-separated we see X is quasi-separated. By Properties, Lemma 28.29.1 we can find an affine open U \subset X containing each \xi _ i. By Algebra, Lemma 10.122.10 we see that after replacing Y by a standard open in Y the morphisms U \to Y is finite. In other words (3) holds.

It is clear that (4) implies all of (1) – (3) with no further assumptions on f. Suppose that f is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. We have to show that the equivalent conditions (1) – (3) imply (4). Let U, V be as in (3). Replace Y by V. Since f is quasi-compact and Y is quasi-compact (being affine) we see that X is quasi-compact. Hence Z = X \setminus U is quasi-compact, hence the morphism f|_ Z : Z \to Y is quasi-compact. By construction of Z we see that \eta \not\in f(Z). Hence by Lemma 29.8.5 we see that there exists an affine open neighbourhood V' of \eta in Y such that f^{-1}(V') \cap Z = \emptyset . Then we have f^{-1}(V') \subset U and this means that f^{-1}(V') \to V' is finite. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 29.51: Generically finite morphisms

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.