42.21 Rational equivalence and the projective line
Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Given any closed subscheme Z \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S = X \times \mathbf{P}^1 we let Z_0, resp. Z_\infty be the scheme theoretic closed subscheme Z_0 = \text{pr}_2^{-1}(D_0), resp. Z_\infty = \text{pr}_2^{-1}(D_\infty ). Here D_0, D_\infty are as in (42.18.1.1).
Lemma 42.21.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Let W \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k + 1. Assume W \not= W_0, and W \not= W_\infty . Then
W_0, W_\infty are effective Cartier divisors of W,
W_0, W_\infty can be viewed as closed subschemes of X and
[W_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [W_\infty ]_ k,
for any locally finite family of integral closed subschemes W_ i \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S of \delta -dimension k + 1 with W_ i \not= (W_ i)_0 and W_ i \not= (W_ i)_\infty we have \sum ([(W_ i)_0]_ k - [(W_ i)_\infty ]_ k) \sim _{rat} 0 on X, and
for any \alpha \in Z_ k(X) with \alpha \sim _{rat} 0 there exists a locally finite family of integral closed subschemes W_ i \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S as above such that \alpha = \sum ([(W_ i)_0]_ k - [(W_ i)_\infty ]_ k).
Proof.
Part (1) follows from Divisors, Lemma 31.13.13 since the generic point of W is not mapped into D_0 or D_\infty under the projection X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \to \mathbf{P}^1_ S by assumption.
Since X \times _ S D_0 \to X is a closed immersion, we see that W_0 is isomorphic to a closed subscheme of X. Similarly for W_\infty . The morphism p : W \to X is proper as a composition of the closed immersion W \to X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S and the proper morphism X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \to X. By Lemma 42.18.2 we have [W_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [W_\infty ]_ k as cycles on W. Hence part (2) follows from Lemma 42.20.3 as clearly p_*[W_0]_ k = [W_0]_ k and similarly for W_\infty .
The only content of statement (3) is, given parts (1) and (2), that the collection \{ (W_ i)_0, (W_ i)_\infty \} is a locally finite collection of closed subschemes of X. This is clear.
Suppose that \alpha \sim _{rat} 0. By definition this means there exist integral closed subschemes V_ i \subset X of \delta -dimension k + 1 and rational functions f_ i \in R(V_ i)^* such that the family \{ V_ i\} _{i \in I} is locally finite in X and such that \alpha = \sum (V_ i \to X)_*\text{div}(f_ i). Let
W_ i \subset V_ i \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S
be the closure of the graph of the rational map f_ i as in Lemma 42.18.2. Then we have that (V_ i \to X)_*\text{div}(f_ i) is equal to [(W_ i)_0]_ k - [(W_ i)_\infty ]_ k by that same lemma. Hence the result is clear.
\square
Lemma 42.21.2. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Let Z be a closed subscheme of X \times \mathbf{P}^1. Assume
\dim _\delta (Z) \leq k + 1,
\dim _\delta (Z_0) \leq k, \dim _\delta (Z_\infty ) \leq k, and
for any embedded point \xi (Divisors, Definition 31.4.1) of Z either \xi \not\in Z_0 \cup Z_\infty or \delta (\xi ) < k.
Then [Z_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [Z_\infty ]_ k as k-cycles on X.
Proof.
Let \{ W_ i\} _{i \in I} be the collection of irreducible components of Z which have \delta -dimension k + 1. Write
[Z]_{k + 1} = \sum n_ i[W_ i]
with n_ i > 0 as per definition. Note that \{ W_ i\} is a locally finite collection of closed subsets of X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S by Divisors, Lemma 31.26.1. We claim that
[Z_0]_ k = \sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k
and similarly for [Z_\infty ]_ k. If we prove this then the lemma follows from Lemma 42.21.1.
Let Z' \subset X be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k. To prove the equality above it suffices to show that the coefficient n of [Z'] in [Z_0]_ k is the same as the coefficient m of [Z'] in \sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k. Let \xi ' \in Z' be the generic point. Set \xi = (\xi ', 0) \in X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S. Consider the local ring A = \mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S, \xi }. Let I \subset A be the ideal cutting out Z, in other words so that A/I = \mathcal{O}_{Z, \xi }. Let t \in A be the element cutting out X \times _ S D_0 (i.e., the coordinate of \mathbf{P}^1 at zero pulled back). By our choice of \xi ' \in Z' we have \delta (\xi ) = k and hence \dim (A/I) = 1. Since \xi is not an embedded point by assumption (3) we see that A/I is Cohen-Macaulay. Since \dim _\delta (Z_0) = k we see that \dim (A/(t, I)) = 0 which implies that t is a nonzerodivisor on A/I. Finally, the irreducible closed subschemes W_ i passing through \xi correspond to the minimal primes I \subset \mathfrak q_ i over I. The multiplicities n_ i correspond to the lengths \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(A/I)_{\mathfrak q_ i}. Hence we see that
n = \text{length}_ A(A/(t, I))
and
m = \sum \text{length}_ A(A/(t, \mathfrak q_ i)) \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(A/I)_{\mathfrak q_ i}
Thus the result follows from Lemma 42.3.2.
\square
Lemma 42.21.3. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on X \times \mathbf{P}^1. Let i_0, i_\infty : X \to X \times \mathbf{P}^1 be the closed immersion such that i_ t(x) = (x, t). Denote \mathcal{F}_0 = i_0^*\mathcal{F} and \mathcal{F}_\infty = i_\infty ^*\mathcal{F}. Assume
\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) \leq k + 1,
\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_0)) \leq k, \dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_\infty )) \leq k, and
for any embedded associated point \xi of \mathcal{F} either \xi \not\in (X \times \mathbf{P}^1)_0 \cup (X \times \mathbf{P}^1)_\infty or \delta (\xi ) < k.
Then [\mathcal{F}_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [\mathcal{F}_\infty ]_ k as k-cycles on X.
Proof.
Let \{ W_ i\} _{i \in I} be the collection of irreducible components of \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}) which have \delta -dimension k + 1. Write
[\mathcal{F}]_{k + 1} = \sum n_ i[W_ i]
with n_ i > 0 as per definition. Note that \{ W_ i\} is a locally finite collection of closed subsets of X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S by Lemma 42.10.1. We claim that
[\mathcal{F}_0]_ k = \sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k
and similarly for [\mathcal{F}_\infty ]_ k. If we prove this then the lemma follows from Lemma 42.21.1.
Let Z' \subset X be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k. To prove the equality above it suffices to show that the coefficient n of [Z'] in [\mathcal{F}_0]_ k is the same as the coefficient m of [Z'] in \sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k. Let \xi ' \in Z' be the generic point. Set \xi = (\xi ', 0) \in X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S. Consider the local ring A = \mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S, \xi }. Let M = \mathcal{F}_\xi as an A-module. Let t \in A be the element cutting out X \times _ S D_0 (i.e., the coordinate of \mathbf{P}^1 at zero pulled back). By our choice of \xi ' \in Z' we have \delta (\xi ) = k and hence \dim (\text{Supp}(M)) = 1. Since \xi is not an associated point of \mathcal{F} by assumption (3) we see that M is a Cohen-Macaulay module. Since \dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_0)) = k we see that \dim (\text{Supp}(M/tM)) = 0 which implies that t is a nonzerodivisor on M. Finally, the irreducible closed subschemes W_ i passing through \xi correspond to the minimal primes \mathfrak q_ i of \text{Ass}(M). The multiplicities n_ i correspond to the lengths \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}M_{\mathfrak q_ i}. Hence we see that
n = \text{length}_ A(M/tM)
and
m = \sum \text{length}_ A(A/(t, \mathfrak q_ i)A) \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}M_{\mathfrak q_ i}
Thus the result follows from Lemma 42.3.2.
\square
Comments (0)