Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 42.31.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X, Y be locally of finite type over S. Let p : X \to Y be a flat morphism of relative dimension r. Let i : D \to X be a relative effective Cartier divisor (Divisors, Definition 31.18.2). Let \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{O}_ X(D). For any \alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + 1}(Y) we have

i^*p^*\alpha = (p|_ D)^*\alpha

in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + r}(D) and

c_1(\mathcal{L}) \cap p^*\alpha = i_* ((p|_ D)^*\alpha )

in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + r}(X).

Proof. Let W \subset Y be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension k + 1. By Divisors, Lemma 31.18.1 we see that D \cap p^{-1}W is an effective Cartier divisor on p^{-1}W. By Lemma 42.29.5 we get the first equality in

i^*[p^{-1}W]_{k + r + 1} = [D \cap p^{-1}W]_{k + r} = [(p|_ D)^{-1}(W)]_{k + r}.

and the second because D \cap p^{-1}(W) = (p|_ D)^{-1}(W) as schemes. Since by definition p^*[W] = [p^{-1}W]_{k + r + 1} we see that i^*p^*[W] = (p|_ D)^*[W] as cycles. If \alpha = \sum m_ j[W_ j] is a general k + 1 cycle, then we get i^*\alpha = \sum m_ j i^*p^*[W_ j] = \sum m_ j(p|_ D)^*[W_ j] as cycles. This proves then first equality. To deduce the second from the first apply Lemma 42.29.4. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.