The Stacks project

Lemma 42.28.5. Let $(S, \delta )$ be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let $X$ be locally of finite type over $S$. Let $(\mathcal{L}, s, i : D \to X)$ be as in Definition 42.28.1.

  1. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme such that $\dim _\delta (Z) \leq k + 1$ and such that $D \cap Z$ is an effective Cartier divisor on $Z$. Then $i^*[Z]_{k + 1} = [D \cap Z]_ k$.

  2. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$ such that $\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) \leq k + 1$ and $s : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}$ is injective. Then

    \[ i^*[\mathcal{F}]_{k + 1} = [i^*\mathcal{F}]_ k \]

    in $\mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(D)$.

Proof. Assume $Z \subset X$ as in (1). Then set $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{O}_ Z$. The assumption that $D \cap Z$ is an effective Cartier divisor is equivalent to the assumption that $s : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}$ is injective. Moreover $[Z]_{k + 1} = [\mathcal{F}]_{k + 1}]$ and $[D \cap Z]_ k = [\mathcal{O}_{D \cap Z}]_ k = [i^*\mathcal{F}]_ k$. See Lemma 42.10.3. Hence part (1) follows from part (2).

Write $[\mathcal{F}]_{k + 1} = \sum m_ j[W_ j]$ with $m_ j > 0$ and pairwise distinct integral closed subschemes $W_ j \subset X$ of $\delta $-dimension $k + 1$. The assumption that $s : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}$ is injective implies that $W_ j \not\subset D$ for all $j$. By definition we see that

\[ i^*[\mathcal{F}]_{k + 1} = \sum [D \cap W_ j]_ k. \]

We claim that

\[ \sum [D \cap W_ j]_ k = [i^*\mathcal{F}]_ k \]

as cycles. Let $Z \subset D$ be an integral closed subscheme of $\delta $-dimension $k$. Let $\xi \in Z$ be its generic point. Let $A = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }$. Let $M = \mathcal{F}_\xi $. Let $f \in A$ be an element generating the ideal of $D$, i.e., such that $\mathcal{O}_{D, \xi } = A/fA$. By assumption $\dim (\text{Supp}(M)) = 1$, the map $f : M \to M$ is injective, and $\text{length}_ A(M/fM) < \infty $. Moreover, $\text{length}_ A(M/fM)$ is the coefficient of $[Z]$ in $[i^*\mathcal{F}]_ k$. On the other hand, let $\mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ t$ be the minimal primes in the support of $M$. Then

\[ \sum \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(M_{\mathfrak q_ i}) \text{ord}_{A/\mathfrak q_ i}(f) \]

is the coefficient of $[Z]$ in $\sum [D \cap W_ j]_ k$. Hence we see the equality by Lemma 42.3.2. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #6637 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on

I think the formula for missed coefficients before .


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02TB. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.