Lemma 10.161.16 (Tate). Let R be a ring. Let x \in R. Assume
R is a normal Noetherian domain,
R/xR is a domain and N-2,
R \cong \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n R/x^ nR is complete with respect to x.
Then R is N-2.
[Theorem 23.1.3, EGA]
Lemma 10.161.16 (Tate). Let R be a ring. Let x \in R. Assume
R is a normal Noetherian domain,
R/xR is a domain and N-2,
R \cong \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n R/x^ nR is complete with respect to x.
Then R is N-2.
Proof. We may assume x \not= 0 since otherwise the lemma is trivial. Let K be the fraction field of R. If the characteristic of K is zero the lemma follows from (1), see Lemma 10.161.11. Hence we may assume that the characteristic of K is p > 0, and we may apply Lemma 10.161.12. Thus given L/K a finite purely inseparable field extension we have to show that the integral closure S of R in L is finite over R.
Let q be a power of p such that L^ q \subset K. By enlarging L if necessary we may assume there exists an element y \in L such that y^ q = x. Since R \to S induces a homeomorphism of spectra (see Lemma 10.46.7) there is a unique prime ideal \mathfrak q \subset S lying over the prime ideal \mathfrak p = xR. It is clear that
since y^ q = x. Observe that R_{\mathfrak p} is a discrete valuation ring by Lemma 10.119.7. Then S_{\mathfrak q} is Noetherian by Krull-Akizuki (Lemma 10.119.12). Whereupon we conclude S_{\mathfrak q} is a discrete valuation ring by Lemma 10.119.7 once again. By Lemma 10.119.10 we see that \kappa (\mathfrak q)/\kappa (\mathfrak p) is a finite field extension. Hence the integral closure S' \subset \kappa (\mathfrak q) of R/xR is finite over R/xR by assumption (2). Since S/yS \subset S' this implies that S/yS is finite over R. Note that S/y^ nS has a finite filtration whose subquotients are the modules y^ iS/y^{i + 1}S \cong S/yS. Hence we see that each S/y^ nS is finite over R. In particular S/xS is finite over R. Also, it is clear that \bigcap x^ nS = (0) since an element in the intersection has qth power contained in \bigcap x^ nR = (0) (Lemma 10.51.4). Thus we may apply Lemma 10.96.12 to conclude that S is finite over R, and we win. \square
Comments (4)
Comment #2749 by Ariyan Javanpeykar on
Comment #2863 by Johan on
Comment #4300 by bogdan on
Comment #4464 by Johan on
There are also: