Lemma 10.162.13. Let (R, \mathfrak m) be a local ring. If R is Noetherian, a domain, and Nagata, then R is analytically unramified.
Proof. By induction on \dim (R). The case \dim (R) = 0 is trivial. Hence we assume \dim (R) = d and that the lemma holds for all Noetherian Nagata domains of dimension < d.
Let R \subset S be the integral closure of R in the field of fractions of R. By assumption S is a finite R-module. By Lemma 10.162.5 we see that S is Nagata. By Lemma 10.112.4 we see \dim (R) = \dim (S). Let \mathfrak m_1, \ldots , \mathfrak m_ t be the maximal ideals of S. Each of these lies over the maximal ideal \mathfrak m of R. Moreover
for sufficiently large n as S/\mathfrak mS is Artinian. By Lemma 10.97.2 R^\wedge \to S^\wedge is an injective map, and by the Chinese Remainder Lemma 10.15.4 combined with Lemma 10.96.9 we have S^\wedge = \prod S^\wedge _ i where S^\wedge _ i is the completion of S with respect to the maximal ideal \mathfrak m_ i. Hence it suffices to show that S_{\mathfrak m_ i} is analytically unramified. In other words, we have reduced to the case where R is a Noetherian normal Nagata domain.
Assume R is a Noetherian, normal, local Nagata domain. Pick a nonzero x \in \mathfrak m in the maximal ideal. We are going to apply Lemma 10.162.12. We have to check properties (1), (2), (3)(a) and (3)(b). Property (1) is clear. We have that R/xR has no embedded primes by Lemma 10.157.6. Thus property (2) holds. The same lemma also tells us each associated prime \mathfrak p of R/xR has height 1. Hence R_{\mathfrak p} is a 1-dimensional normal domain hence regular (Lemma 10.119.7). Thus (3)(a) holds. Finally (3)(b) holds by induction hypothesis, since R/\mathfrak p is Nagata (by Lemma 10.162.5 or directly from the definition). Thus we conclude R is analytically unramified. \square
Comments (7)
Comment #1513 by kollar on
Comment #1515 by Johan on
Comment #1519 by kollar on
Comment #1523 by Johan on
Comment #1524 by kollar on
Comment #1526 by Johan on
Comment #1553 by Johan on
There are also: