The Stacks project

[IV, Proposition 6.3.1, EGA]

Lemma 10.163.1. We have

\[ \text{depth}(M \otimes _ R N) = \text{depth}(M) + \text{depth}(N/\mathfrak m_ RN) \]

where $R \to S$ is a local homomorphism of local Noetherian rings, $M$ is a finite $R$-module, and $N$ is a finite $S$-module flat over $R$.

Proof. In the statement and in the proof below, we take the depth of $M$ as an $R$-module, the depth of $M \otimes _ R N$ as an $S$-module, and the depth of $N/\mathfrak m_ RN$ as an $S/\mathfrak m_ RS$-module. Denote $n$ the right hand side. First assume that $n$ is zero. Then both $\text{depth}(M) = 0$ and $\text{depth}(N/\mathfrak m_ RN) = 0$. This means there is a $z \in M$ whose annihilator is $\mathfrak m_ R$ and a $\overline{y} \in N/\mathfrak m_ RN$ whose annihilator is $\mathfrak m_ S/\mathfrak m_ RS$. Let $y \in N$ be a lift of $\overline{y}$. Since $N$ is flat over $R$ the map $z : R/\mathfrak m_ R \to M$ produces an injective map $N/\mathfrak m_ RN \to M \otimes _ R N$. Hence the annihilator of $z \otimes y$ is $\mathfrak m_ S$. Thus $\text{depth}(M \otimes _ R N) = 0$ as well.

Assume $n > 0$. If $\text{depth}(N/\mathfrak m_ RN) > 0$, then we may choose $f \in \mathfrak m_ S$ mapping to $\overline{f} \in S/\mathfrak m_ RS$ which is a nonzerodivisor on $N/\mathfrak m_ RN$. Then $\text{depth}(N/\mathfrak m_ RN) = \text{depth}(N/(f, \mathfrak m_ R)N) + 1$ by Lemma 10.72.7. According to Lemma 10.99.1 the element $f \in S$ is a nonzerodivisor on $N$ and $N/fN$ is flat over $R$. Hence by induction on $n$ we have

\[ \text{depth}(M \otimes _ R N/fN) = \text{depth}(M) + \text{depth}(N/(f, \mathfrak m_ R)N). \]

Because $N/fN$ is flat over $R$ the sequence

\[ 0 \to M \otimes _ R N \to M \otimes _ R N \to M \otimes _ R N/fN \to 0 \]

is exact where the first map is multiplication by $f$ (Lemma 10.39.12). Hence by Lemma 10.72.7 we find that $\text{depth}(M \otimes _ R N) = \text{depth}(M \otimes _ R N/fN) + 1$ and we conclude that equality holds in the formula of the lemma.

If $n > 0$, but $\text{depth}(N/\mathfrak m_ RN) = 0$, then we can choose $f \in \mathfrak m_ R$ which is a nonzerodivisor on $M$. As $N$ is flat over $R$ it is also the case that $f$ is a nonzerodivisor on $M \otimes _ R N$. By induction on $n$ again we have

\[ \text{depth}(M/fM \otimes _ R N) = \text{depth}(M/fM) + \text{depth}(N/\mathfrak m_ RN). \]

In this case $\text{depth}(M \otimes _ R N) = \text{depth}(M/fM \otimes _ R N) + 1$ and $\text{depth}(M) = \text{depth}(M/fM) + 1$ by Lemma 10.72.7 and we conclude that equality holds in the formula of the lemma. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #3241 by Dario WeiƟmann on

Typo in the first sentence of the proof: ...and the depth of

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0338. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.