Lemma 32.12.6. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a scheme locally of finite type over $k$. Let $x \in X$. Then $X$ is geometrically regular at $x$ if and only if $X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ is smooth at $x$ (Morphisms, Definition 28.32.1).

**Proof.**
The question is local around $x$, hence we may assume that $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ for some finite type $k$-algebra. Let $x$ correspond to the prime $\mathfrak p$.

If $A$ is smooth over $k$ at $\mathfrak p$, then we may localize $A$ and assume that $A$ is smooth over $k$. In this case $k' \otimes _ k A$ is smooth over $k'$ for all extension fields $k'/k$, and each of these Noetherian rings is regular by Algebra, Lemma 10.139.3.

Assume $X$ is geometrically regular at $x$. Consider the residue field $K := \kappa (x) = \kappa (\mathfrak p)$ of $x$. It is a finitely generated extension of $k$. By Algebra, Lemma 10.44.3 there exists a finite purely inseparable extension $k \subset k'$ such that the compositum $k'K$ is a separable field extension of $k'$. Let $\mathfrak p' \subset A' = k' \otimes _ k A$ be a prime ideal lying over $\mathfrak p$. It is the unique prime lying over $\mathfrak p$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.45.7. Hence the residue field $K' := \kappa (\mathfrak p')$ is the compositum $k'K$. By assumption the local ring $(A')_{\mathfrak p'}$ is regular. Hence by Algebra, Lemma 10.139.5 we see that $k' \to A'$ is smooth at $\mathfrak p'$. This in turn implies that $k \to A$ is smooth at $\mathfrak p$ by Algebra, Lemma 10.136.18. The lemma is proved. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (2)

Comment #4267 by Tim Holzschuh on

Comment #4437 by Johan on