Lemma 29.57.4. A composition of morphisms with universally bounded fibres is a morphism with universally bounded fibres. More precisely, assume that n bounds the degrees of the fibres of f : X \to Y and m bounds the degrees of g : Y \to Z. Then nm bounds the degrees of the fibres of g \circ f : X \to Z.
Proof. Let f : X \to Y and g : Y \to Z have universally bounded fibres. Say that \deg (X_ y/\kappa (y)) \leq n for all y \in Y, and that \deg (Y_ z/\kappa (z)) \leq m for all z \in Z. Let z \in Z be a point. By assumption the scheme Y_ z is finite over \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (z)). In particular, the underlying topological space of Y_ z is a finite discrete set. The fibres of the morphism f_ z : X_ z \to Y_ z are the fibres of f at the corresponding points of Y, which are finite discrete sets by the reasoning above. Hence we conclude that the underlying topological space of X_ z is a finite discrete set as well. Thus X_ z is an affine scheme (this is a nice exercise; it also follows for example from Properties, Lemma 28.29.1 applied to the set of all points of X_ z). Write X_ z = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A), Y_ z = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B), and k = \kappa (z). Then k \to B \to A and we know that (a) \dim _ k(B) \leq m, and (b) for every maximal ideal \mathfrak m \subset B we have \dim _{\kappa (\mathfrak m)}(A/\mathfrak mA) \leq n. We claim this implies that \dim _ k(A) \leq nm. Note that B is the product of its localizations B_{\mathfrak m}, for example because Y_ z is a disjoint union of 1-point schemes, or by Algebra, Lemmas 10.53.2 and 10.53.6. So we see that \dim _ k(B) = \sum _{\mathfrak m} \dim _ k(B_{\mathfrak m}) and \dim _ k(A) = \sum _{\mathfrak m} \dim _ k(A_{\mathfrak m}) where in both cases \mathfrak m runs over the maximal ideals of B (not of A). By the above, and Nakayama's Lemma (Algebra, Lemma 10.20.1) we see that each A_{\mathfrak m} is a quotient of B_{\mathfrak m}^{\oplus n} as a B_{\mathfrak m}-module. Hence \dim _ k(A_{\mathfrak m}) \leq n \dim _ k(B_{\mathfrak m}). Putting everything together we see that
as desired. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #5538 by Michael on
Comment #5727 by Johan on