The Stacks project

59.24 Picard groups

The following theorem is sometimes called “Hilbert 90”.

Theorem 59.24.1. For any scheme $X$ we have canonical identifications

\begin{align*} H_{fppf}^1(X, \mathbf{G}_ m) & = H^1_{syntomic}(X, \mathbf{G}_ m) \\ & = H^1_{smooth}(X, \mathbf{G}_ m) \\ & = H_{\acute{e}tale}^1(X, \mathbf{G}_ m) \\ & = H^1_{Zar}(X, \mathbf{G}_ m) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X) \\ & = H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_ X^*) \end{align*}

Proof. Let $\tau $ be one of the topologies considered in Section 59.20. By Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.6.1 we see that $H^1_\tau (X, \mathbf{G}_ m) = H^1_\tau (X, \mathcal{O}_\tau ^*) = \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (\mathcal{O}_\tau )$ where $\mathcal{O}_\tau $ is the structure sheaf of the site $(\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau $. Now an invertible $\mathcal{O}_\tau $-module is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_\tau $-module. By Theorem 59.17.4 or the more precise Descent, Proposition 35.8.9 we see that $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (\mathcal{O}_\tau ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X)$. The last equality is proved in the same way. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 03P7. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.