Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Remark 59.36.3. More generally, let \mathcal{C}_1, \mathcal{C}_2 be sites, and assume they have final objects and fibre products. Let u: \mathcal{C}_2 \to \mathcal{C}_1 be a functor satisfying:

  1. if \{ V_ i \to V\} is a covering of \mathcal{C}_2, then \{ u(V_ i) \to u(V)\} is a covering of \mathcal{C}_1 (we say that u is continuous), and

  2. u commutes with finite limits (i.e., u is left exact, i.e., u preserves fibre products and final objects).

Then one can define f_*: \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_1) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_2) by f_* \mathcal{F}(V) = \mathcal{F}(u(V)). Moreover, there exists an exact functor f^{-1} which is left adjoint to f_*, see Sites, Definition 7.14.1 and Proposition 7.14.7. Warning: It is not enough to require simply that u is continuous and commutes with fibre products in order to get a morphism of topoi.


Comments (2)

Comment #2052 by Yuzhou Gu on

Should "{u(Vi)->Vi}" be "{u(Vi)->u(V)}"?

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 59.36: Inverse image

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.