## 59.36 Inverse image

In this section we briefly discuss pullback of sheaves on the small étale sites. The precise construction of this is in Topologies, Section 34.4.

Definition 59.36.1. Let $f: X\to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. The *inverse image*, or *pullback*^{1} functors are the functors

\[ f^{-1} = f_{small}^{-1} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}) \]

and

\[ f^{-1} = f_{small}^{-1} : \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale}) \]

which are left adjoint to $f_* = f_{small, *}$. Thus $f^{-1}$ is characterized by the fact that

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})}} (f^{-1}\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale})} (\mathcal{G}, f_*\mathcal{F}) \]

functorially, for any $\mathcal{F} \in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})$ and $\mathcal{G} \in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale})$. We similarly have

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{{\textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale})}} (f^{-1}\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale})} (\mathcal{G}, f_*\mathcal{F}) \]

for $\mathcal{F} \in \textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale})$ and $\mathcal{G} \in \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale})$.

It is not trivial that such an adjoint exists. On the other hand, it exists in a fairly general setting, see Remark 59.36.3 below. The general machinery shows that $f^{-1}\mathcal{G}$ is the sheaf associated to the presheaf

59.36.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{etale-cohomology-equation-pullback} U/X \longmapsto \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{U \to X \times _ Y V} \mathcal{G}(V/Y) \end{equation}

where the colimit is over the category of pairs $(V/Y, \varphi : U/X \to X \times _ Y V/X)$. To see this apply Sites, Proposition 7.14.7 to the functor $u$ of Equation (59.34.0.1) and use the description of $u_ s = (u_ p\ )^\# $ in Sites, Sections 7.13 and 7.5. We will occasionally use this formula for the pullback in order to prove some of its basic properties.

Lemma 59.36.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.

The functor $f^{-1} : \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale})$ is exact.

The functor $f^{-1} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})$ is exact, i.e., it commutes with finite limits and colimits, see Categories, Definition 4.23.1.

Let $\overline{x} \to X$ be a geometric point. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a sheaf on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$. Then there is a canonical identification

\[ (f^{-1}\mathcal{G})_{\overline{x}} = \mathcal{G}_{\overline{y}}. \]

where $\overline{y} = f \circ \overline{x}$.

For any $V \to Y$ étale we have $f^{-1}h_ V = h_{X \times _ Y V}$.

**Proof.**
The exactness of $f^{-1}$ on sheaves of sets is a consequence of Sites, Proposition 7.14.7 applied to our functor $u$ of Equation (59.34.0.1). In fact the exactness of pullback is part of the definition of a morphism of topoi (or sites if you like). Thus we see (2) holds. It implies part (1) since given an abelian sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$ the underlying sheaf of sets of $f^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ is the same as $f^{-1}$ of the underlying sheaf of sets of $\mathcal{F}$, see Sites, Section 7.44. See also Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.31.2. In the literature (1) and (2) are sometimes deduced from (3) via Theorem 59.29.10.

Part (3) is a general fact about stalks of pullbacks, see Sites, Lemma 7.34.2. We will also prove (3) directly as follows. Note that by Lemma 59.29.9 taking stalks commutes with sheafification. Now recall that $f^{-1}\mathcal{G}$ is the sheaf associated to the presheaf

\[ U \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{U \to X \times _ Y V} \mathcal{G}(V), \]

see Equation (59.36.1.1). Thus we have

\begin{align*} (f^{-1}\mathcal{G})_{\overline{x}} & = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(U, \overline{u})} f^{-1}\mathcal{G}(U) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(U, \overline{u})} \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{a : U \to X \times _ Y V} \mathcal{G}(V) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(V, \overline{v})} \mathcal{G}(V) \\ & = \mathcal{G}_{\overline{y}} \end{align*}

in the third equality the pair $(U, \overline{u})$ and the map $a : U \to X \times _ Y V$ corresponds to the pair $(V, a \circ \overline{u})$.

Part (4) can be proved in a similar manner by identifying the colimits which define $f^{-1}h_ V$. Or you can use Yoneda's lemma (Categories, Lemma 4.3.5) and the functorial equalities

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})}(f^{-1}h_ V, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale})}(h_ V, f_*\mathcal{F}) = f_*\mathcal{F}(V) = \mathcal{F}(X \times _ Y V) \]

combined with the fact that representable presheaves are sheaves. See also Sites, Lemma 7.13.5 for a completely general result.
$\square$

The pair of functors $(f_*, f^{-1})$ define a morphism of small étale topoi

\[ f_{small} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \]

Many generalities on cohomology of sheaves hold for topoi and morphisms of topoi. We will try to point out when results are general and when they are specific to the étale topos.

## Comments (3)

Comment #2053 by Yuzhou Gu on

Comment #7381 by Long Liu on

Comment #7580 by Stacks Project on