The Stacks project

Definition 83.5.13. Let $S$ be a scheme, and let $B$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $j : R \to U \times _ B U$ be a pre-relation over $B$.

  1. We say $j$ is a set-theoretic pre-equivalence relation if for all algebraically closed fields $k$ over $B$ the relation $\sim _ R$ on $U(k)$ defined by

    \[ \overline{u} \sim _ R \overline{u}' \Leftrightarrow \begin{matrix} \exists \text{ field extension }K/k, \ \exists \ r \in R(K), \\ s(r) = \overline{u}, \ t(r) = \overline{u}' \end{matrix} \]

    is an equivalence relation.

  2. We say $j$ is a set-theoretic equivalence relation if $j$ is universally injective and a set-theoretic pre-equivalence relation.


Comments (2)

Comment #5365 by Will Chen on

I don't think the notation has been used before in this section. I assume this refers to equivalence? (as opposed to weak equivalence?)

(Also, weak equivalence is actually stronger than equivalence, is that right?)

Comment #5602 by on

@#5365: No, I guess the symbol in the definition is used to indicate that the left hand side is defined by the formula on the right hand side. I have tried to make this more clear in this commit.

Be careful comparing the different notions in this section. For some of them we take the equivalence relation generated by and for others we don't. We could write a lot more about the different notions introduced in this section.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0490. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.