Lemma 75.13.6. Let $S$ be a scheme contained in $\mathit{Sch}_{fppf}$. Let $F, G, H : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}^{opp} \to \textit{Sets}$. Let $a : F \to G$, $b : G \to H$ be transformations of functors. Assume that $a$ is representable, surjective, and étale.

1. If $b$ is formally smooth, then $b \circ a$ is formally smooth.

2. If $b$ is formally étale, then $b \circ a$ is formally étale.

3. If $b$ is formally unramified, then $b \circ a$ is formally unramified.

Conversely, consider a solid commutative diagram

$\xymatrix{ G \ar[d]_ b & T \ar[d]^ i \ar[l] \\ H & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu] }$

with $T'$ an affine scheme over $S$ and $i : T \to T'$ a closed immersion defined by an ideal of square zero.

1. If $b \circ a$ is formally smooth, then for every $t \in T$ there exists an étale morphism of affines $U' \to T'$ and a morphism $U' \to G$ such that

$\xymatrix{ G \ar[d]_ b & T \ar[l] & T \times _{T'} U' \ar[d] \ar[l]\\ H & T' \ar[l] & U' \ar[llu] \ar[l] }$

commutes and $t$ is in the image of $U' \to T'$.

2. If $b \circ a$ is formally unramified, then there exists at most one dotted arrow in the diagram above, i.e., $b$ is formally unramified.

3. If $b \circ a$ is formally étale, then there exists exactly one dotted arrow in the diagram above, i.e., $b$ is formally étale.

Proof. Assume $b$ is formally smooth (resp. formally étale, resp. formally unramified). Since an étale morphism is both smooth and unramified we see that $a$ is representable and smooth (resp. étale, resp. unramified). Hence parts (1), (2) and (3) follow from a combination of Lemma 75.13.5 and Lemma 75.13.3.

Assume that $b \circ a$ is formally smooth. Consider a diagram as in the statement of the lemma. Let $W = F \times _ G T$. By assumption $W$ is a scheme surjective étale over $T$. By Étale Morphisms, Theorem 41.15.2 there exists a scheme $W'$ étale over $T'$ such that $W = T \times _{T'} W'$. Choose an affine open subscheme $U' \subset W'$ such that $t$ is in the image of $U' \to T'$. Because $b \circ a$ is formally smooth we see that the exist morphisms $U' \to F$ such that

$\xymatrix{ F \ar[d]_{b \circ a} & W \ar[l] & T \times _{T'} U' \ar[d] \ar[l]\\ H & T' \ar[l] & U' \ar[llu] \ar[l] }$

commutes. Taking the composition $U' \to F \to G$ gives a map as in part (5) of the lemma.

Assume that $f, g : T' \to G$ are two dotted arrows fitting into the diagram of the lemma. Let $W = F \times _ G T$. By assumption $W$ is a scheme surjective étale over $T$. By Étale Morphisms, Theorem 41.15.2 there exists a scheme $W'$ étale over $T'$ such that $W = T \times _{T'} W'$. Since $a$ is formally étale the compositions

$W' \to T' \xrightarrow {f} G \quad \text{and}\quad W' \to T' \xrightarrow {g} G$

lift to morphisms $f', g' : W' \to F$ (lift on affine opens and glue by uniqueness). Now if $b \circ a : F \to H$ is formally unramified, then $f' = g'$ and hence $f = g$ as $W' \to T'$ is an étale covering. This proves part (6) of the lemma.

Assume that $b \circ a$ is formally étale. Then by part (4) we can étale locally on $T'$ find a dotted arrow fitting into the diagram and by part (5) this dotted arrow is unique. Hence we may glue the local solutions to get assertion (6). Some details omitted. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04CY. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.