Lemma 59.43.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume (B) holds. Then the functor $f_{small, *} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale})$ transforms surjections into surjections.

## 59.43 Property (B)

Please see Section 59.41 for the definition of property (B).

**Proof.**
This follows from Sites, Lemma 7.41.2.
$\square$

Lemma 59.43.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Suppose

$V \to Y$ is an étale morphism of schemes,

$\{ U_ i \to X \times _ Y V\} $ is an étale covering, and

$v \in V$ is a point.

Assume that for any such data there exists an étale neighbourhood $(V', v') \to (V, v)$, a disjoint union decomposition $X \times _ Y V' = \coprod W'_ i$, and morphisms $W'_ i \to U_ i$ over $X \times _ Y V$. Then property (B) holds.

**Proof.**
Omitted.
$\square$

Lemma 59.43.3. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite morphism of schemes. Then property (B) holds.

**Proof.**
Consider $V \to Y$ étale, $\{ U_ i \to X \times _ Y V\} $ an étale covering, and $v \in V$. We have to find a $V' \to V$ and decomposition and maps as in Lemma 59.43.2. We may shrink $V$ and $Y$, hence we may assume that $V$ and $Y$ are affine. Since $X$ is finite over $Y$, this also implies that $X$ is affine. During the proof we may (finitely often) replace $(V, v)$ by an étale neighbourhood $(V', v')$ and correspondingly the covering $\{ U_ i \to X \times _ Y V\} $ by $\{ V' \times _ V U_ i \to X \times _ Y V'\} $.

Since $X \times _ Y V \to V$ is finite there exist finitely many (pairwise distinct) points $x_1, \ldots , x_ n \in X \times _ Y V$ mapping to $v$. We may apply More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.41.5 to $X \times _ Y V \to V$ and the points $x_1, \ldots , x_ n$ lying over $v$ and find an étale neighbourhood $(V', v') \to (V, v)$ such that

with $T_ a \to V'$ finite with exactly one point $p_ a$ lying over $v'$ and moreover $\kappa (v') \subset \kappa (p_ a)$ purely inseparable, and such that $R \to V'$ has empty fibre over $v'$. Because $X \to Y$ is finite, also $R \to V'$ is finite. Hence after shrinking $V'$ we may assume that $R = \emptyset $. Thus we may assume that $X \times _ Y V = X_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg X_ n$ with exactly one point $x_ l \in X_ l$ lying over $v$ with moreover $\kappa (v) \subset \kappa (x_ l)$ purely inseparable. Note that this property is preserved under refinement of the étale neighbourhood $(V, v)$.

For each $l$ choose an $i_ l$ and a point $u_ l \in U_{i_ l}$ mapping to $x_ l$. Now we apply property (A) for the finite morphism $X \times _ Y V \to V$ and the étale morphisms $U_{i_ l} \to X \times _ Y V$ and the points $u_ l$. This is permissible by Lemma 59.42.3 This gives produces an étale neighbourhood $(V', v') \to (V, v)$ and decompositions

and $X$-morphisms $a_ l : W_ l \to U_{i_ l}$ whose image contains $u_{i_ l}$. Here is a picture:

After replacing $(V, v)$ by $(V', v')$ we conclude that each $x_ l$ is contained in an open and closed neighbourhood $W_ l$ such that the inclusion morphism $W_ l \to X \times _ Y V$ factors through $U_ i \to X \times _ Y V$ for some $i$. Replacing $W_ l$ by $W_ l \cap X_ l$ we see that these open and closed sets are disjoint and moreover that $\{ x_1, \ldots , x_ n\} \subset W_1 \cup \ldots \cup W_ n$. Since $X \times _ Y V \to V$ is finite we may shrink $V$ and assume that $X \times _ Y V = W_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg W_ n$ as desired. $\square$

Lemma 59.43.4. Let $f : X \to Y$ be an integral morphism of schemes. Then property (B) holds.

**Proof.**
Consider $V \to Y$ étale, $\{ U_ i \to X \times _ Y V\} $ an étale covering, and $v \in V$. We have to find a $V' \to V$ and decomposition and maps as in Lemma 59.43.2. We may shrink $V$ and $Y$, hence we may assume that $V$ and $Y$ are affine. Since $X$ is integral over $Y$, this also implies that $X$ and $X \times _ Y V$ are affine. We may refine the covering $\{ U_ i \to X \times _ Y V\} $, and hence we may assume that $\{ U_ i \to X \times _ Y V\} _{i = 1, \ldots , n}$ is a standard étale covering. Write $Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$, $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$, $V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C)$, and $U_ i = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_ i)$. Then $A \to B$ is an integral ring map, and $B \otimes _ A C \to B_ i$ are étale ring maps. By Algebra, Lemma 10.143.3 we can find a finite $A$-subalgebra $B' \subset B$ and an étale ring map $B' \otimes _ A C \to B'_ i$ for $i = 1, \ldots , n$ such that $B_ i = B \otimes _{B'} B'_ i$. Thus the question reduces to the étale covering $\{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B'_ i) \to X' \times _ Y V\} _{i = 1, \ldots , n}$ with $X' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B')$ finite over $Y$. In this case the result follows from Lemma 59.43.3.
$\square$

Lemma 59.43.5. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $f$ is integral (for example finite). Then

$f_{small, *}$ transforms surjections into surjections (on sheaves of sets and on abelian sheaves),

$f_{small}^{-1}f_{small, *}\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}$ is surjective for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$,

$f_{small, *} : \textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale})$ is faithful and reflects injections and surjections, and

$f_{small, *} : \textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale})$ is exact.

**Proof.**
Parts (2), (3) we have seen in Lemma 59.42.4. Part (1) follows from Lemmas 59.43.4 and 59.43.1. Part (4) is a consequence of part (1), see Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.15.2.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)