The Stacks project

Proposition 59.47.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes which is integral and universally injective.

  1. The functor

    \[ f_{small, *} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \]

    is fully faithful and its essential image is those sheaves of sets $\mathcal{F}$ on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$ whose restriction to $Y \setminus f(X)$ is isomorphic to $*$, and

  2. the functor

    \[ f_{small, *} : \textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \]

    is fully faithful and its essential image is those abelian sheaves on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$ whose support is contained in $f(X)$.

In both cases $f_{small}^{-1}$ is a left inverse to the functor $f_{small, *}$.

Proof. We may factor $f$ as

\[ \xymatrix{ X \ar[r]^ h & Z \ar[r]^ i & Y } \]

where $h$ is integral, universally injective and surjective and $i : Z \to Y$ is a closed immersion. Apply Proposition 59.46.4 to $i$ and apply Theorem 59.45.2 to $h$. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04FZ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.