Theorem 59.45.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $f$ is integral, universally injective and surjective (i.e., $f$ is a universal homeomorphism, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.45.5). The functor

defines an equivalence of categories

[IV Theorem 18.1.2, EGA]

Theorem 59.45.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $f$ is integral, universally injective and surjective (i.e., $f$ is a universal homeomorphism, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.45.5). The functor

\[ V \longmapsto V_ X = X \times _ Y V \]

defines an equivalence of categories

\[ \{ \text{schemes }V\text{ étale over }Y \} \leftrightarrow \{ \text{schemes }U\text{ étale over }X \} \]

**First proof.**
By Theorem 59.45.1 we see that the functor is fully faithful. It remains to show that the functor is essentially surjective. Let $U \to X$ be an étale morphism of schemes.

Suppose that the result holds if $U$ and $Y$ are affine. In that case, we choose an affine open covering $U = \bigcup U_ i$ such that each $U_ i$ maps into an affine open of $Y$. By assumption (affine case) we can find étale morphisms $V_ i \to Y$ such that $X \times _ Y V_ i \cong U_ i$ as schemes over $X$. Let $V_{i, i'} \subset V_ i$ be the open subscheme whose underlying topological space corresponds to $U_ i \cap U_{i'}$. Because we have isomorphisms

\[ X \times _ Y V_{i, i'} \cong U_ i \cap U_{i'} \cong X \times _ Y V_{i', i} \]

as schemes over $X$ we see by fully faithfulness that we obtain isomorphisms $\theta _{i, i'} : V_{i, i'} \to V_{i', i}$ of schemes over $Y$. We omit the verification that these isomorphisms satisfy the cocycle condition of Schemes, Section 26.14. Applying Schemes, Lemma 26.14.2 we obtain a scheme $V \to Y$ by glueing the schemes $V_ i$ along the identifications $\theta _{i, i'}$. It is clear that $V \to Y$ is étale and $X \times _ Y V \cong U$ by construction.

Thus it suffices to show the lemma in case $U$ and $Y$ are affine. Recall that in the proof of Theorem 59.45.1 we showed that $U$ comes with a unique descent datum $(U, \varphi )$ relative to $X/Y$. By Étale Morphisms, Proposition 41.20.6 (which applies because $U \to X$ is quasi-compact and separated as well as étale by our reduction to the affine case) there exists an étale morphism $V \to Y$ such that $X \times _ Y V \cong U$ and the proof is complete. $\square$

**Second proof.**
By Theorem 59.45.1 we see that the functor is fully faithful. It remains to show that the functor is essentially surjective. Let $U \to X$ be an étale morphism of schemes.

Suppose that the result holds if $U$ and $Y$ are affine. In that case, we choose an affine open covering $U = \bigcup U_ i$ such that each $U_ i$ maps into an affine open of $Y$. By assumption (affine case) we can find étale morphisms $V_ i \to Y$ such that $X \times _ Y V_ i \cong U_ i$ as schemes over $X$. Let $V_{i, i'} \subset V_ i$ be the open subscheme whose underlying topological space corresponds to $U_ i \cap U_{i'}$. Because we have isomorphisms

\[ X \times _ Y V_{i, i'} \cong U_ i \cap U_{i'} \cong X \times _ Y V_{i', i} \]

as schemes over $X$ we see by fully faithfulness that we obtain isomorphisms $\theta _{i, i'} : V_{i, i'} \to V_{i', i}$ of schemes over $Y$. We omit the verification that these isomorphisms satisfy the cocycle condition of Schemes, Section 26.14. Applying Schemes, Lemma 26.14.2 we obtain a scheme $V \to Y$ by glueing the schemes $V_ i$ along the identifications $\theta _{i, i'}$. It is clear that $V \to Y$ is étale and $X \times _ Y V \cong U$ by construction.

Thus it suffices to prove that the functor

59.45.2.1

\begin{equation} \label{etale-cohomology-equation-affine-etale} \{ \text{affine schemes }V\text{ étale over }Y \} \leftrightarrow \{ \text{affine schemes }U\text{ étale over }X \} \end{equation}

is essentially surjective when $X$ and $Y$ are affine.

Let $U \to X$ be an affine scheme étale over $X$. We have to find $V \to Y$ étale (and affine) such that $X \times _ Y V$ is isomorphic to $U$ over $X$. Note that an étale morphism of affines has universally bounded fibres, see Morphisms, Lemmas 29.36.6 and 29.56.9. Hence we can do induction on the integer $n$ bounding the degree of the fibres of $U \to X$. See Morphisms, Lemma 29.56.8 for a description of this integer in the case of an étale morphism. If $n = 1$, then $U \to X$ is an open immersion (see Étale Morphisms, Theorem 41.14.1), and the result is clear. Assume $n > 1$.

By Lemma 59.44.4 there exists an étale morphism of schemes $W \to Y$ and a surjective morphism $W_ X \to U$ over $X$. As $U$ is quasi-compact we may replace $W$ by a disjoint union of finitely many affine opens of $W$, hence we may assume that $W$ is affine as well. Here is a diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] & U \times _ Y W \ar[l] \ar[d] & W_ X \amalg R \ar@{=}[l]\\ X \ar[d] & W_ X \ar[l] \ar[d] \\ Y & W \ar[l] } \]

The disjoint union decomposition arises because by construction the étale morphism of affine schemes $U \times _ Y W \to W_ X$ has a section. OK, and now we see that the morphism $R \to X \times _ Y W$ is an étale morphism of affine schemes whose fibres have degree universally bounded by $n - 1$. Hence by induction assumption there exists a scheme $V' \to W$ étale such that $R \cong W_ X \times _ W V'$. Taking $V'' = W \amalg V'$ we find a scheme $V''$ étale over $W$ whose base change to $W_ X$ is isomorphic to $U \times _ Y W$ over $X \times _ Y W$.

At this point we can use descent to find $V$ over $Y$ whose base change to $X$ is isomorphic to $U$ over $X$. Namely, by the fully faithfulness of the functor (59.45.2.1) corresponding to the universal homeomorphism $X \times _ Y (W \times _ Y W) \to (W \times _ Y W)$ there exists a unique isomorphism $\varphi : V'' \times _ Y W \to W \times _ Y V''$ whose base change to $X \times _ Y (W \times _ Y W)$ is the canonical descent datum for $U \times _ Y W$ over $X \times _ Y W$. In particular $\varphi $ satisfies the cocycle condition. Hence by Descent, Lemma 35.37.1 we see that $\varphi $ is effective (recall that all schemes above are affine). Thus we obtain $V \to Y$ and an isomorphism $V'' \cong W \times _ Y V$ such that the canonical descent datum on $W \times _ Y V/W/Y$ agrees with $\varphi $. Note that $V \to Y$ is étale, by Descent, Lemma 35.23.29. Moreover, there is an isomorphism $V_ X \cong U$ which comes from descending the isomorphism

\[ V_ X \times _ X W_ X = X \times _ Y V \times _ Y W = (X \times _ Y W) \times _ W (W \times _ Y V) \cong W_ X \times _ W V'' \cong U \times _ Y W \]

which we have by construction. Some details omitted. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (2)

Comment #2697 by Frankie Muniz on

Comment #2733 by Takumi Murayama on