Lemma 41.18.3. Let $f : X \to S$ be a finite étale morphism of schemes. Let $s \in S$. There exists an étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and a finite disjoint union decomposition

of schemes such that each $V_ j \to U$ is an isomorphism.

Lemma 41.18.3. Let $f : X \to S$ be a finite étale morphism of schemes. Let $s \in S$. There exists an étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and a finite disjoint union decomposition

\[ X_ U = \coprod \nolimits _ j V_ j \]

of schemes such that each $V_ j \to U$ is an isomorphism.

**Proof.**
An étale morphism is unramified, hence we may apply Lemma 41.17.3. As in the proof of Lemma 41.18.1 we see that $V_{i, j} \to U$ is an open immersion and we win after replacing $U$ by the intersection of their images.
$\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: