Loading web-font TeX/Caligraphic/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 35.32.4. Let \mathcal{P} be a property of morphisms of schemes which is étale local on source-and-target. Then

  1. \mathcal{P} is étale local on the source,

  2. \mathcal{P} is étale local on the target,

  3. \mathcal{P} is stable under postcomposing with étale morphisms: if f : X \to Y has \mathcal{P} and g : Y \to Z is étale, then g \circ f has \mathcal{P}, and

  4. \mathcal{P} has a permanence property: given f : X \to Y and g : Y \to Z étale such that g \circ f has \mathcal{P}, then f has \mathcal{P}.

Proof. We write everything out completely.

Proof of (1). Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let \{ X_ i \to X\} _{i \in I} be an étale covering of X. If each composition h_ i : X_ i \to Y has \mathcal{P}, then for each x \in X we can find an i \in I and a point x_ i \in X_ i mapping to x. Then (X_ i, x_ i) \to (X, x) is an étale morphism of germs, and \text{id}_ Y : Y \to Y is an étale morphism, and h_ i is as in part (3) of Definition 35.32.3. Thus we see that f has \mathcal{P}. Conversely, if f has \mathcal{P} then each X_ i \to Y has \mathcal{P} by Definition 35.32.3 part (1).

Proof of (2). Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let \{ Y_ i \to Y\} _{i \in I} be an étale covering of Y. Write X_ i = Y_ i \times _ Y X and h_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i for the base change of f. If each h_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i has \mathcal{P}, then for each x \in X we pick an i \in I and a point x_ i \in X_ i mapping to x. Then (X_ i, x_ i) \to (X, x) is an étale morphism of germs, Y_ i \to Y is étale, and h_ i is as in part (3) of Definition 35.32.3. Thus we see that f has \mathcal{P}. Conversely, if f has \mathcal{P}, then each X_ i \to Y_ i has \mathcal{P} by Definition 35.32.3 part (2).

Proof of (3). Assume f : X \to Y has \mathcal{P} and g : Y \to Z is étale. For every x \in X we can think of (X, x) \to (X, x) as an étale morphism of germs, Y \to Z is an étale morphism, and h = f is as in part (3) of Definition 35.32.3. Thus we see that g \circ f has \mathcal{P}.

Proof of (4). Let f : X \to Y be a morphism and g : Y \to Z étale such that g \circ f has \mathcal{P}. Then by Definition 35.32.3 part (2) we see that \text{pr}_ Y : Y \times _ Z X \to Y has \mathcal{P}. But the morphism (f, 1) : X \to Y \times _ Z X is étale as a section to the étale projection \text{pr}_ X : Y \times _ Z X \to X, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.18. Hence f = \text{pr}_ Y \circ (f, 1) has \mathcal{P} by Definition 35.32.3 part (1). \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.