Lemma 100.4.3. Let

be a fibre product of algebraic stacks. Then the map of sets of points

is surjective.

Lemma 100.4.3. Let

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{X} \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathcal{X} \ar[d] \\ \mathcal{Z} \ar[r] & \mathcal{Y} } \]

be a fibre product of algebraic stacks. Then the map of sets of points

\[ |\mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{X}| \longrightarrow |\mathcal{Z}| \times _{|\mathcal{Y}|} |\mathcal{X}| \]

is surjective.

**Proof.**
Namely, suppose given fields $K$, $L$ and morphisms $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to \mathcal{X}$, $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(L) \to \mathcal{Z}$, then the assumption that they agree as elements of $|\mathcal{Y}|$ means that there is a common extension $M/K$ and $M/L$ such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(M) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(M) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(L) \to \mathcal{Z} \to \mathcal{Y}$ are $2$-isomorphic. And this is exactly the condition which says you get a morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(M) \to \mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{X}$.
$\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: