Lemma 33.25.7. Let $X$ be a reduced scheme that is locally of finite type over a field $k$. Then $X$ is geometrically reduced over $k$ if and only if $X$ contains a dense open which is smooth over $k$.
Proof. The problem is local on $X$, hence we may assume $X$ is quasi-compact. Let $X = X_1 \cup \ldots \cup X_ n$ be the irreducible components of $X$. First suppose that $X$ contains a dense open which is smooth over $k$. Then $X$ is geometrically reduced at the generic point of each $X_ i$ (for example by Lemma 33.25.4). By Lemma 33.6.8, it follows that $X$ is geometrically reduced.
Conversely, suppose that $X$ is geometrically reduced. Since $Z = \bigcup _{i \not= j} X_ i \cap X_ j$ is nowhere dense in $X$, we may replace $X$ by $X \setminus Z$. As $X \setminus Z$ is a disjoint union of irreducible schemes, this reduces us to the case where $X$ is irreducible. As $X$ is irreducible and reduced, it is integral, see Properties, Lemma 28.3.4. Let $\eta \in X$ be its generic point. Then the function field $K = k(X) = \kappa (\eta ) = \mathcal{O}_{X, \eta }$ is geometrically reduced over $k$, hence separable over $k$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.44.2. Let $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \subset X$ be any nonempty affine open so that $K = A_{(0)}$ is the fraction field of $A$. Apply Algebra, Lemma 10.140.5 to conclude that $A$ is smooth at $(0)$ over $k$. By definition this means that some principal localization of $A$ is smooth over $k$ and we win. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (1)
Comment #1931 by Keenan Kidwell on