Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

110.8 Noncomplete quotient

Let k be a field. Let

R = k[t, z_1, z_2, z_3, \ldots , w_1, w_2, w_3, \ldots , x]/ (z_ it - x^ iw_ i, z_ i w_ j)

Note that in particular z_ iz_ jt = 0 in this ring. Any element f of R can be uniquely written as a finite sum

f = \sum \nolimits _{i = 0, \ldots , d} f_ i x^ i

where each f_ i \in k[t, z_ i, w_ j] has no terms involving the products z_ it or z_ iw_ j. Moreover, if f is written in this way, then f \in (x^ n) if and only if f_ i = 0 for i < n. So x is a nonzerodivisor and \bigcap (x^ n) = 0. Let R^\wedge be the completion of R with respect to the ideal (x). Note that R^\wedge is (x)-adically complete, see Algebra, Lemma 10.96.3. By the above we see that an element of R^\wedge can be uniquely written as an infinite sum

f = \sum \nolimits _{i = 0}^\infty f_ i x^ i

where each f_ i \in k[t, z_ i, w_ j] has no terms involving the products z_ it or z_ iw_ j. Consider the element

f = \sum \nolimits _{i = 1}^\infty x^ i w_ i = xw_1 + x^2w_2 + x^3w_3 + \ldots

i.e., we have f_ n = w_ n. Note that f \in (t , x^ n) for every n because x^ mw_ m \in (t) for all m. We claim that f \not\in (t). To prove this assume that tg = f where g = \sum g_ lx^ l in canonical form as above. Since tz_ iz_ j = 0 we may as well assume that none of the g_ l have terms involving the products z_ iz_ j. Examining the process to get tg in canonical form we see the following: Given any term c m of g_ l where c \in k and m is a monomial in t, z_ i, w_ j and we make the following replacement

  1. if the monomial m does not involve any z_ i, then ctm is a term of f_ l, and

  2. if the monomial m does involve a z_ i then it is equal to m = z_ i and we see that cw_ i is term of f_{l + i}.

Since g_0 is a polynomial only finitely many of the variables z_ i occur in it. Pick n such that z_ n does not occur in g_0. Then the rules above show that w_ n does not occur in f_ n which is a contradiction. It follows that R^\wedge /(t) is not complete, see Algebra, Lemma 10.96.10.

Lemma 110.8.1. There exists a ring R complete with respect to a principal ideal I and a principal ideal J such that R/J is not I-adically complete.

Proof. See discussion above. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.