Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 32.18.1. Let I be a directed set. Let (f_ i : X_ i \to S_ i) be an inverse system of morphisms of schemes over I. Assume

  1. all the morphisms S_{i'} \to S_ i are affine,

  2. all the schemes S_ i are quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

  3. the morphisms f_ i are of finite type, and

  4. the morphisms X_{i'} \to X_ i \times _{S_ i} S_{i'} are closed immersions.

Let f : X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i X_ i \to S = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i S_ i be the limit. Let d \geq 0. If every fibre of f has dimension \leq d, then for some i every fibre of f_ i has dimension \leq d.

Proof. For each i let U_ i = \{ x \in X_ i \mid \dim _ x((X_ i)_{f_ i(x)}) \leq d\} . This is an open subset of X_ i, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.4. Set Z_ i = X_ i \setminus U_ i (with reduced induced scheme structure). We have to show that Z_ i = \emptyset for some i. If not, then Z = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i \not= \emptyset , see Lemma 32.4.3. Say z \in Z is a point. Note that Z \subset X is a closed subscheme. Set s = f(z). For each i let s_ i \in S_ i be the image of s. We remark that Z_ s is the limit of the schemes (Z_ i)_{s_ i} and Z_ s is also the limit of the schemes (Z_ i)_{s_ i} base changed to \kappa (s). Moreover, all the morphisms

Z_ s \longrightarrow (Z_{i'})_{s_{i'}} \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s_{i'}))} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s)) \longrightarrow (Z_ i)_{s_ i} \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s_ i))} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s)) \longrightarrow X_ s

are closed immersions by assumption (4). Hence Z_ s is the scheme theoretic intersection of the closed subschemes (Z_ i)_{s_ i} \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s_ i))} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s)) in X_ s. Since all the irreducible components of the schemes (Z_ i)_{s_ i} \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s_ i))} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (s)) have dimension > d and contain z we conclude that Z_ s contains an irreducible component of dimension > d passing through z which contradicts the fact that Z_ s \subset X_ s and \dim (X_ s) \leq d. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.