Lemma 4.22.9. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Let M : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C} be a diagram with filtered index category \mathcal{I}. The following are equivalent
M is an essentially constant ind-object,
there exists a cocone (X, \{ M_ i \to X\} _ i) such that for any W in \mathcal{C} the map \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, X) is bijective,
X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i M_ i exists and for any W in \mathcal{C} the map \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, X) is bijective, and
there exists an i in \mathcal{I} and a morphism X \to M_ i such that for any W in \mathcal{C} the map \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{j \geq i} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ j) is bijective.
In cases (2), (3), and (4) the value of the essentially constant system is X.
Proof.
It is clear that (3) implies (2). Assume (2). Then \text{id}_ X \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(X, X) comes from a morphism X \to M_ i for some i, i.e., X \to M_ i \to X is the identity. Then both maps
\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, X) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ i) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, X)
are bijective for all W where the first one is induced by the morphism X \to M_ i we found above, and the composition is the identity. This means that the composition
\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ i) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, X) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ i)
is the identity too. Setting W = M_ j and starting with \text{id}_{M_ j} in the colimit, we see that M_ j \to X \to M_ i \to M_ k is equal to M_ j \to M_ k for some k large enough. This proves (1) holds.
Assume (4). Let k be an object of \mathcal{I}. Setting W = M_ k we deduce there exists a unique morphism M_ k \to X such that there exists a j and morphisms k \to j and i \to j in \mathcal{I} such that M_ k \to X \to M_ i \to M_ j is equal to M_ k \to M_ j. The uniqueness guarantees that we obtain a cocone (X, \{ M_ k \to X\} ). In this way we see that (4) implies (2); some details omitted.
We omit the proof that (1) implies the other conditions.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #8282 by Et on
Comment #8915 by Stacks project on
There are also: