Processing math: 0%

The Stacks project

Lemma 4.22.10. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Let M : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C} be a diagram with cofiltered index category \mathcal{I}. The following are equivalent

  1. M is an essentially constant pro-object,

  2. there exists a cone (X, \{ X \to M_ i\} ) such that for any W in \mathcal{C} the map \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in \mathcal{I}^{opp}} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(M_ i, W) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(X, W) is bijective,

  3. X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i M_ i exists and for any W in \mathcal{C} the map \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in \mathcal{I}^{opp}} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(M_ i, W) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(X, W) is bijective, and

  4. there exists an i in \mathcal{I} and a morphism M_ i \to X such that for any W in \mathcal{C} the map \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(X, W) \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in \mathcal{I}^{opp}} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(M_ i, W) is bijective.

In cases (2), (3), and (4) the value of the essentially constant system is X.

Proof. This lemma is dual to Lemma 4.22.9. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 10 comment(s) on Section 4.22: Essentially constant systems

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.