Lemma 13.4.16. Let \mathcal{D} be a pre-triangulated category. Assume that \mathcal{D}' is an additive full subcategory of \mathcal{D}. The following are equivalent
there exists a set of triangles \mathcal{T}' such that (\mathcal{D}', \mathcal{T}') is a pre-triangulated subcategory of \mathcal{D},
\mathcal{D}' is preserved under [1] and [1] : \mathcal{D}' \to \mathcal{D}' is an auto-equivalence and given any morphism f : X \to Y in \mathcal{D}' there exists a distinguished triangle (X, Y, Z, f, g, h) in \mathcal{D} such that Z is isomorphic to an object of \mathcal{D}'.
In this case \mathcal{T}' as in (1) is the set of distinguished triangles (X, Y, Z, f, g, h) of \mathcal{D} such that X, Y, Z \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}'). Finally, if \mathcal{D} is a triangulated category, then (1) and (2) are also equivalent to
\mathcal{D}' is a triangulated subcategory.
Comments (3)
Comment #1584 by Darij Grinberg on
Comment #8863 by Elías Guisado on
Comment #9226 by Stacks project on
There are also: