Here is the analogue of Schemes, Lemma 26.6.4.
Lemma 66.33.1. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $\mathbf{Z}$. Let $T$ be an affine scheme. The map which maps $f$ to $f^\sharp $ (on global sections) is bijective.
\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (X, T) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (\Gamma (T, \mathcal{O}_ T), \Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X)) \]
Proof. We construct the inverse of the map. Let $\varphi : \Gamma (T, \mathcal{O}_ T) \to \Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ be a ring map. Choose a presentation $X = U/R$, see Spaces, Definition 65.9.3. By Schemes, Lemma 26.6.4 the composition
corresponds to a unique morphism of schemes $g : U \to T$. By the same lemma the two compositions $R \to U \to T$ are equal. Hence we obtain a morphism $f : X = U/R \to T$ such that $U \to X \to T$ equals $g$. By construction the diagram
commutes. Hence $f^\sharp $ equals $\varphi $ because $U \to X$ is an étale covering and $\mathcal{O}_ X$ is a sheaf on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. The uniqueness of $f$ follows from the uniqueness of $g$. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (2)
Comment #4074 by Matthieu Romagny on
Comment #4149 by Johan on