Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Remark 10.69.7 (Other types of regular sequences). In the paper [Kabele] the author discusses two more regularity conditions for sequences x_1, \ldots , x_ r of elements of a ring R. Namely, we say the sequence is Koszul-regular if H_ i(K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet })) = 0 for i \geq 1 where K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet }) is the Koszul complex. The sequence is called H_1-regular if H_1(K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet })) = 0. One has the implications regular \Rightarrow Koszul-regular \Rightarrow H_1-regular \Rightarrow quasi-regular. By examples the author shows that these implications cannot be reversed in general even if R is a (non-Noetherian) local ring and the sequence generates the maximal ideal of R. We introduce these notions in more detail in More on Algebra, Section 15.30.


Comments (2)

Comment #7023 by Jonathan on

In this remark, the implications regular Koszul-regular -regular quasi-regular assume that is local, while in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/062D below the first definition (concretely, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/062F, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0CEM, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/062I) this assumption is not made. Can the assumption that is local be removed here?

There are also:

  • 5 comment(s) on Section 10.69: Quasi-regular sequences

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.