Definition 10.69.1. Let R be a ring. Let M be an R-module. A sequence of elements f_1, \ldots , f_ c of R is called M-quasi-regular if (10.69.0.1) is an isomorphism. If M = R, we call f_1, \ldots , f_ c simply a quasi-regular sequence.
10.69 Quasi-regular sequences
We introduce the notion of quasi-regular sequence which is slightly weaker than that of a regular sequence and easier to use. Let R be a ring and let f_1, \ldots , f_ c \in R. Set J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ c). Let M be an R-module. Then there is a canonical map
of graded R/J[X_1, \ldots , X_ c]-modules defined by the rule
Note that (10.69.0.1) is always surjective.
So if f_1, \ldots , f_ c is a quasi-regular sequence, then
where J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ c). It is clear that being a quasi-regular sequence is independent of the order of f_1, \ldots , f_ c.
Lemma 10.69.2. Let R be a ring.
A regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_ c of R is a quasi-regular sequence.
Suppose that M is an R-module and that f_1, \ldots , f_ c is an M-regular sequence. Then f_1, \ldots , f_ c is an M-quasi-regular sequence.
Proof. Set J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ c). We prove the first assertion by induction on c. We have to show that given any relation \sum _{|I| = n} a_ I f^ I \in J^{n + 1} with a_ I \in R we actually have a_ I \in J for all multi-indices I. Since any element of J^{n + 1} is of the form \sum _{|I| = n} b_ I f^ I with b_ I \in J we may assume, after replacing a_ I by a_ I - b_ I, the relation reads \sum _{|I| = n} a_ I f^ I = 0. We can rewrite this as
Here and below the “primed” multi-indices I' are required to be of the form I' = (i_1, \ldots , i_{c - 1}, 0). We will show by descending induction on l \in \{ 0, \ldots , n\} that if we have a relation
then a_{I', e} \in J for all I', e. Namely, set J' = (f_1, \ldots , f_{c-1}). Observe that \sum \nolimits _{|I'| = n - l} a_{I', l} f^{I'} is mapped into (J')^{n - l + 1} by f_ c^{l}. By induction hypothesis (for the induction on c) we see that f_ c^ l a_{I', l} \in J'. Because f_ c is not a zerodivisor on R/J' (as f_1, \ldots , f_ c is a regular sequence) we conclude that a_{I', l} \in J'. This allows us to rewrite the term (\sum \nolimits _{|I'| = n - l} a_{I', l} f^{I'})f_ c^ l in the form (\sum \nolimits _{|I'| = n - l + 1} f_ c b_{I', l - 1} f^{I'})f_ c^{l-1}. This gives a new relation of the form
Now by the induction hypothesis (on l this time) we see that all a_{I', l-1} + f_ c b_{I', l - 1} \in J and all a_{I', e} \in J for e \leq l - 2. This, combined with a_{I', l} \in J' \subset J seen above, finishes the proof of the induction step.
The second assertion means that given any formal expression F = \sum _{|I| = n} m_ I X^ I, m_ I \in M with \sum m_ I f^ I \in J^{n + 1}M, then all the coefficients m_ I are in J. This is proved in exactly the same way as we prove the corresponding result for the first assertion above. \square
Lemma 10.69.3. Let R \to R' be a flat ring map. Let M be an R-module. Suppose that f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R form an M-quasi-regular sequence. Then the images of f_1, \ldots , f_ r in R' form a M \otimes _ R R'-quasi-regular sequence.
Proof. Set J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ r), J' = JR' and M' = M \otimes _ R R'. We have to show the canonical map \mu : R'/J'[X_1, \ldots X_ r] \otimes _{R'/J'} M'/J'M' \to \bigoplus (J')^ nM'/(J')^{n + 1}M' is an isomorphism. Because R \to R' is flat the sequences 0 \to J^ nM \to M and 0 \to J^{n + 1}M \to J^ nM \to J^ nM/J^{n + 1}M \to 0 remain exact on tensoring with R'. This first implies that J^ nM \otimes _ R R' = (J')^ nM' and then that (J')^ nM'/(J')^{n + 1}M' = J^ nM/J^{n + 1}M \otimes _ R R'. Thus \mu is the tensor product of (10.69.0.1), which is an isomorphism by assumption, with \text{id}_{R'} and we conclude. \square
Lemma 10.69.4. Let R be a Noetherian ring. Let M be a finite R-module. Let \mathfrak p be a prime. Let x_1, \ldots , x_ c be a sequence in R whose image in R_{\mathfrak p} forms an M_{\mathfrak p}-quasi-regular sequence. Then there exists a g \in R, g \not\in \mathfrak p such that the image of x_1, \ldots , x_ c in R_ g forms an M_ g-quasi-regular sequence.
Proof. Consider the kernel K of the map (10.69.0.1). As M/JM \otimes _{R/J} R/J[X_1, \ldots , X_ c] is a finite R/J[X_1, \ldots , X_ c]-module and as R/J[X_1, \ldots , X_ c] is Noetherian, we see that K is also a finite R/J[X_1, \ldots , X_ c]-module. Pick homogeneous generators k_1, \ldots , k_ t \in K. By assumption for each i = 1, \ldots , t there exists a g_ i \in R, g_ i \not\in \mathfrak p such that g_ i k_ i = 0. Hence g = g_1 \ldots g_ t works. \square
Lemma 10.69.5. Let R be a ring. Let M be an R-module. Let f_1, \ldots , f_ c \in R be an M-quasi-regular sequence. For any i the sequence \overline{f}_{i + 1}, \ldots , \overline{f}_ c of \overline{R} = R/(f_1, \ldots , f_ i) is an \overline{M} = M/(f_1, \ldots , f_ i)M-quasi-regular sequence.
Proof. It suffices to prove this for i = 1. Set \overline{J} = (\overline{f}_2, \ldots , \overline{f}_ c) \subset \overline{R}. Then
Thus, in order to prove the lemma it suffices to show that J^{n + 1}M + J^ nM \cap f_1M = J^{n + 1}M + f_1J^{n - 1}M because that will show that \bigoplus _{n \geq 0} \overline{J}^ n\overline{M}/\overline{J}^{n + 1}\overline{M} is the quotient of \bigoplus _{n \geq 0} J^ nM/J^{n + 1}M \cong M/JM[X_1, \ldots , X_ c] by X_1. Actually, we have J^ nM \cap f_1M = f_1J^{n - 1}M. Namely, if m \not\in J^{n - 1}M, then f_1m \not\in J^ nM because \bigoplus J^ nM/J^{n + 1}M is the polynomial algebra M/J[X_1, \ldots , X_ c] by assumption. \square
Lemma 10.69.6. Let (R, \mathfrak m) be a local Noetherian ring. Let M be a nonzero finite R-module. Let f_1, \ldots , f_ c \in \mathfrak m be an M-quasi-regular sequence. Then f_1, \ldots , f_ c is an M-regular sequence.
Proof. Set J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ c). Let us show that f_1 is a nonzerodivisor on M. Suppose x \in M is not zero. By Krull's intersection theorem there exists an integer r such that x \in J^ rM but x \not\in J^{r + 1}M, see Lemma 10.51.4. Then f_1 x \in J^{r + 1}M is an element whose class in J^{r + 1}M/J^{r + 2}M is nonzero by the assumed structure of \bigoplus J^ nM/J^{n + 1}M. Whence f_1x \not= 0.
Now we can finish the proof by induction on c using Lemma 10.69.5. \square
Remark 10.69.7 (Other types of regular sequences). In the paper [Kabele] the author discusses two more regularity conditions for sequences x_1, \ldots , x_ r of elements of a ring R. Namely, we say the sequence is Koszul-regular if H_ i(K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet })) = 0 for i \geq 1 where K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet }) is the Koszul complex. The sequence is called H_1-regular if H_1(K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet })) = 0. One has the implications regular \Rightarrow Koszul-regular \Rightarrow H_1-regular \Rightarrow quasi-regular. By examples the author shows that these implications cannot be reversed in general even if R is a (non-Noetherian) local ring and the sequence generates the maximal ideal of R. We introduce these notions in more detail in More on Algebra, Section 15.30.
Remark 10.69.8. Let k be a field. Consider the ring
In this ring x is a nonzerodivisor and the image of y in A/xA gives a quasi-regular sequence. But it is not true that x, y is a quasi-regular sequence in A because (x, y)/(x, y)^2 isn't free of rank two over A/(x, y) due to the fact that wx = 0 in (x, y)/(x, y)^2 but w isn't zero in A/(x, y). Hence the analogue of Lemma 10.68.7 does not hold for quasi-regular sequences.
Lemma 10.69.9. Let R be a ring. Let J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ r) be an ideal of R. Let M be an R-module. Set \overline{R} = R/\bigcap _{n \geq 0} J^ n, \overline{M} = M/\bigcap _{n \geq 0} J^ nM, and denote \overline{f}_ i the image of f_ i in \overline{R}. Then f_1, \ldots , f_ r is M-quasi-regular if and only if \overline{f}_1, \ldots , \overline{f}_ r is \overline{M}-quasi-regular.
Proof. This is true because J^ nM/J^{n + 1}M \cong \overline{J}^ n\overline{M}/\overline{J}^{n + 1}\overline{M}. \square
Comments (5)
Comment #7891 by Laurent Berger on
Comment #8156 by Aise Johan de Jong on
Comment #8824 by Ryo Suzuki on
Comment #9266 by Stacks project on
Comment #9788 by Oliver on