Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 97.12.7. Let F : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a 1-morphism of stacks in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. Assume F is representable by algebraic spaces and locally of finite presentation. Then

p : \mathcal{H}_ d(\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{Y}) \to \mathcal{Y}

is limit preserving on objects.

Proof. This means we have to show the following: Given

  1. an affine scheme U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i U_ i which is written as the directed limit of affine schemes U_ i over S,

  2. an object y_ i of \mathcal{Y} over U_ i for some i, and

  3. an object \Xi = (U, Z, y, x, \alpha ) of \mathcal{H}_ d(\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{Y}) over U such that y = y_ i|_ U,

then there exists an i' \geq i and an object \Xi _{i'} = (U_{i'}, Z_{i'}, y_{i'}, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'}) of \mathcal{H}_ d(\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{Y}) over U_{i'} with \Xi _{i'}|_ U = \Xi and y_{i'} = y_ i|_{U_{i'}}. Namely, the last two equalities will take care of the commutativity of (97.5.0.1).

Let X_{y_ i} \to U_ i be an algebraic space representing the 2-fibre product

(\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y_ i, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X}.

Note that X_{y_ i} \to U_ i is locally of finite presentation by our assumption on F. Write \Xi . It is clear that \xi = (Z, Z \to U_ i, x, \alpha ) is an object of the 2-fibre product displayed above, hence \xi gives rise to a morphism f_\xi : Z \to X_{y_ i} of algebraic spaces over U_ i (since X_{y_ i} is the functor of isomorphisms classes of objects of (\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X}, see Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.8.2). By Limits, Lemmas 32.10.1 and 32.8.8 there exists an i' \geq i and a finite locally free morphism Z_{i'} \to U_{i'} of degree d whose base change to U is Z. By Limits of Spaces, Proposition 70.3.10 we may, after replacing i' by a bigger index, assume there exists a morphism f_{i'} : Z_{i'} \to X_{y_ i} such that

\xymatrix{ Z \ar[d] \ar[r] \ar@/^3ex/[rr]^{f_\xi } & Z_{i'} \ar[d] \ar[r]_{f_{i'}} & X_{y_ i} \ar[d] \\ U \ar[r] & U_{i'} \ar[r] & U_ i }

is commutative. We set \Xi _{i'} = (U_{i'}, Z_{i'}, y_{i'}, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'}) where

  1. y_{i'} is the object of \mathcal{Y} over U_{i'} which is the pullback of y_ i to U_{i'},

  2. x_{i'} is the object of \mathcal{X} over Z_{i'} corresponding via the 2-Yoneda lemma to the 1-morphism

    (\mathit{Sch}/Z_{i'})_{fppf} \to \mathcal{S}_{X_{y_ i}} \to (\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y_ i, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X}

    where the middle arrow is the equivalence which defines X_{y_ i} (notation as in Algebraic Stacks, Sections 94.8 and 94.7).

  3. \alpha _{i'} : y_{i'}|_{Z_{i'}} \to F(x_{i'}) is the isomorphism coming from the 2-commutativity of the diagram

    \xymatrix{ (\mathit{Sch}/Z_{i'})_{fppf} \ar[r] \ar[rd] & (\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y_ i, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X} \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathcal{X} \ar[d]^ F \\ & (\mathit{Sch}/U_{i'})_{fppf} \ar[r] & \mathcal{Y} }

Recall that f_\xi : Z \to X_{y_ i} was the morphism corresponding to the object \xi = (Z, Z \to U_ i, x, \alpha ) of (\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y_ i, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X} over Z. By construction f_{i'} is the morphism corresponding to the object \xi _{i'} = (Z_{i'}, Z_{i'} \to U_ i, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'}). As f_\xi = f_{i'} \circ (Z \to Z_{i'}) we see that the object \xi _{i'} = (Z_{i'}, Z_{i'} \to U_ i, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'}) pulls back to \xi over Z. Thus x_{i'} pulls back to x and \alpha _{i'} pulls back to \alpha . This means that \Xi _{i'} pulls back to \Xi over U and we win. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.