Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 90.27.4. Let (U, R, s, t, c) be a minimal smooth prorepresentable groupoid in functors on \mathcal{C}_\Lambda . If \varphi : [U/R] \to [U/R] is an equivalence of categories cofibered in groupoids, then \varphi is an isomorphism.

Proof. A morphism \varphi : [U/R] \to [U/R] is the same thing as a morphism \varphi : (U, R, s, t, c) \to (U, R, s, t, c) of groupoids in functors over \mathcal{C}_\Lambda as defined in Definition 90.21.1. Denote \phi : U \to U and \psi : R \to R the corresponding morphisms. Because the diagram

\xymatrix{ & \text{Der}_\Lambda (k, k) \ar[dr]_\gamma \ar[dl]^\gamma \\ TU \ar[rr]_{d\phi } \ar[d] & & TU \ar[d] \\ T[U/R] \ar[rr]^{d\varphi } & & T[U/R] }

is commutative, since d\varphi is bijective, and since we have the characterization of minimality in Lemma 90.27.2 we conclude that d\phi is injective (hence bijective by dimension reasons). Thus \phi : U \to U is an isomorphism by Lemma 90.27.3. We can use a similar argument, using the exact sequence

0 \to \text{Inf}([U/R]) \to TR \to TU \oplus TU

of Lemma 90.26.2 to prove that \psi : R \to R is an isomorphism. But is also a consequence of the fact that R = U \times _{[U/R]} U and that \varphi and \phi are isomorphisms. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.