Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 100.11.2. Let \mathcal{Z} be an algebraic stack. The following are equivalent

  1. \mathcal{Z} is reduced and |\mathcal{Z}| is a singleton,

  2. there exists a surjective flat morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z} where k is a field, and

  3. there exists a locally of finite type, surjective, flat morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z} where k is a field.

Proof. Assume (1). Let W be a scheme and let W \to \mathcal{Z} be a surjective smooth morphism. Then W is a reduced scheme. Let \eta \in W be a generic point of an irreducible component of W. Since W is reduced we have \mathcal{O}_{W, \eta } = \kappa (\eta ). It follows that the canonical morphism \eta = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (\eta )) \to W is flat. We see that the composition \eta \to \mathcal{Z} is flat (see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.3). It is also surjective as |\mathcal{Z}| is a singleton. In other words (2) holds.

Assume (2). Let W be a scheme and let W \to \mathcal{Z} be a surjective smooth morphism. Choose a field k and a surjective flat morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z}. Then W \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is an algebraic space smooth over k, hence regular (see Spaces over Fields, Lemma 72.16.1) and in particular reduced. Since W \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to W is surjective and flat we conclude that W is reduced (Descent on Spaces, Lemma 74.9.2). In other words (1) holds.

It is clear that (3) implies (2). Finally, assume (2). Pick a nonempty affine scheme W and a smooth morphism W \to \mathcal{Z}. Pick a closed point w \in W and set k = \kappa (w). The composition

\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \xrightarrow {w} W \longrightarrow \mathcal{Z}

is locally of finite type by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.23.2 and 67.37.6. It is also flat and surjective by Lemma 100.11.1. Hence (3) holds. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 100.11: Residual gerbes

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.