Proof.
Assume (1). Let W be a scheme and let W \to \mathcal{Z} be a surjective smooth morphism. Then W is a reduced scheme. Let \eta \in W be a generic point of an irreducible component of W. Since W is reduced we have \mathcal{O}_{W, \eta } = \kappa (\eta ). It follows that the canonical morphism \eta = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (\eta )) \to W is flat. We see that the composition \eta \to \mathcal{Z} is flat (see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.3). It is also surjective as |\mathcal{Z}| is a singleton. In other words (2) holds.
Assume (2). Let W be a scheme and let W \to \mathcal{Z} be a surjective smooth morphism. Choose a field k and a surjective flat morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z}. Then W \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is an algebraic space smooth over k, hence regular (see Spaces over Fields, Lemma 72.16.1) and in particular reduced. Since W \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to W is surjective and flat we conclude that W is reduced (Descent on Spaces, Lemma 74.9.2). In other words (1) holds.
It is clear that (3) implies (2). Finally, assume (2). Pick a nonempty affine scheme W and a smooth morphism W \to \mathcal{Z}. Pick a closed point w \in W and set k = \kappa (w). The composition
\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \xrightarrow {w} W \longrightarrow \mathcal{Z}
is locally of finite type by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.23.2 and 67.37.6. It is also flat and surjective by Lemma 100.11.1. Hence (3) holds.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: