Proposition 101.29.1. Let \mathcal{X} be a reduced algebraic stack such that \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X} is quasi-compact. Then there exists a dense open substack \mathcal{U} \subset \mathcal{X} which is a gerbe.
Proof. According to Proposition 101.28.9 it is enough to find a dense open substack \mathcal{U} such that \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {U} \to \mathcal{U} is flat and locally of finite presentation. Note that \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {U} = \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{U}, see Lemma 101.5.5.
Choose a presentation \mathcal{X} = [U/R]. Let G \to U be the stabilizer group algebraic space of the groupoid R. By Lemma 101.5.7 we see that G \to U is the base change of \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X} hence quasi-compact (by assumption) and locally of finite type (by Lemma 101.5.1). Let W \subset U be the largest open (possibly empty) subscheme such that the restriction G_ W \to W is flat and locally of finite presentation (we omit the proof that W exists; hint: use that the properties are local). By Morphisms of Spaces, Proposition 67.32.1 we see that W \subset U is dense. Note that W \subset U is R-invariant by More on Groupoids in Spaces, Lemma 79.6.2. Hence W corresponds to an open substack \mathcal{U} \subset \mathcal{X} by Properties of Stacks, Lemma 100.9.11. Since |U| \to |\mathcal{X}| is open and |W| \subset |U| is dense we conclude that \mathcal{U} is dense in \mathcal{X}. Finally, the morphism \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {U} \to \mathcal{U} is flat and locally of finite presentation because the base change by the surjective smooth morphism W \to \mathcal{U} is the morphism G_ W \to W which is flat and locally of finite presentation by construction. See Lemmas 101.25.4 and 101.27.11. \square
Comments (0)