Definition 96.6.1. Let p : \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} be a category fibred in groupoids. The structure sheaf of \mathcal{X} is the sheaf of rings \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X} = p^{-1}\mathcal{O}.
96.6 The structure sheaf
Let \tau \in \{ Zar, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic, fppf\} . Let p : \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} be a category fibred in groupoids. The 2-category of categories fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} has a final object, namely, \text{id} : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} and p is a 1-morphism from \mathcal{X} to this final object. Hence any presheaf \mathcal{G} on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} gives a presheaf p^{-1}\mathcal{G} on \mathcal{X} defined by the rule p^{-1}\mathcal{G}(x) = \mathcal{G}(p(x)). Moreover, the discussion in Section 96.4 shows that p^{-1}\mathcal{G} is a \tau sheaf whenever \mathcal{G} is a \tau -sheaf.
Recall that the site (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} is a ringed site with structure sheaf \mathcal{O} defined by the rule
see Descent, Definition 35.8.2.
For an object x of \mathcal{X} lying over U we have \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}(x) = \mathcal{O}(U) = \Gamma (U, \mathcal{O}_ U). Needless to say \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X} is also a Zariski, étale, smooth, and syntomic sheaf, and hence each of the sites \mathcal{X}_{Zar}, \mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{X}_{smooth}, \mathcal{X}_{syntomic}, and \mathcal{X}_{fppf} is a ringed site. This construction is functorial as well.
Lemma 96.6.2. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a 1-morphism of categories fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. Let \tau \in \{ Zar, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic, fppf\} . There is a canonical identification f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {Y} = \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X} which turns f : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}_\tau ) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{Y}_\tau ) into a morphism of ringed topoi.
Proof. Denote p : \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} and q : \mathcal{Y} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} the structural functors. Then p = q \circ f, hence p^{-1} = f^{-1} \circ q^{-1} by Lemma 96.3.2. Since \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X} = p^{-1}\mathcal{O} and \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {Y} = q^{-1}\mathcal{O} the result follows. \square
Remark 96.6.3. In the situation of Lemma 96.6.2 the morphism of ringed topoi f : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}_\tau ) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{Y}_\tau ) is flat as is clear from the equality f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X} = \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {Y}. This is a bit counter intuitive, for example because a closed immersion of algebraic stacks is typically not flat (as a morphism of algebraic stacks). However, exactly the same thing happens when taking a closed immersion i : X \to Y of schemes: in this case the associated morphism of big \tau -sites i : (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau \to (\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau also is flat.
Comments (2)
Comment #6537 by Hadi Hedayatzadeh on
Comment #6589 by Johan on